Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

What happened here?

1175 new c#3.0 questions

Was it a retag? (I couldn't find any [retag-request] about this.)

If it's the result of a retag, shouldn't the tag rather be [c#-3.0]? This format seems to have become the canonical "language version" format (see the existing tag synonyms).

On the other hand, the other C# version tags like [c#2.0]) also don't contain a hyphen.

Should the tags for special C# versions be hyphened, or not? Is [c#x.0] preferable, or should [c#-x.0] be used, which would be consistent with other languages?

share|improve this question
    
Hm... there seem to be whole buckets of oddities in tag creation these days... – Grace Note Jul 20 '10 at 23:29

C#3.0 should exist as a tag. There are features that are specific to C# 3.0 like LINQ and anonymous object initialization.

It should be whatever the convention for language version tags is. If it's C#-x.0 then so be it.

share|improve this answer
    
I don't think this was ever in question, it was just whether or not a - should be part of the tag – Michael Mrozek Jul 21 '10 at 4:18
    
The title of the question is 'should it exist'? Thats'w here I got that idea from. – George Stocker Jul 21 '10 at 11:08
    
Ah, I see. I interpreted that as "should it exist, or should it be [c#-3.0] instead", not "should it exist, or should all c# questions be under one tag" – Michael Mrozek Jul 21 '10 at 18:06

I don't think it's new. I was going to file a retag request a few days ago to go the other way ([c#x] to [c#-x]), but there are already tag synonyms to do so, they just aren't applied retroactively. I didn't exactly follow why that is, but I suspect when they finish implementing tag synonyms they're going to apply them to all the old posts in a mass retag

share|improve this answer
    
I don't see any such tag synonyms on stackoverflow.com/tags/synonyms – sth Jul 20 '10 at 23:44
    
I blew off the synonym it was the wrong way around – waffles Jul 21 '10 at 2:12
    
@waffles Oh good, I'm not insane – Michael Mrozek Jul 21 '10 at 4:17

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .