Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

A little niggle, but once a feature has been accepted or rejected it makes no difference in the long term how someone votes either on the question or on an answer. I will grant you that there is a period of volatility after the initial imposition of the accept/reject status where some discussion and voting is valuable, but once the status is stable I think the question/answers should be locked.

Getting a down vote on a feature request that has already been declined, in particular, seems like adding insult to injury.

Configuring meta to derive rep from the main site instead of maintaining it's own rep a la the new StackExchange sites would mitigate this, but honestly once the issue has been decided and come to rest, what's the point of continuing to vote.

share|improve this question

Sometimes feature-requests aren't implemented exactly, so you may want to vote them up, so that more attention is drawn to them in the future.

Also, I vote up old feature-requests to reward the ones that I think were good. Good feature-requests that make our life easier should be able to keep earning rewards.

share|improve this answer
    
Voting on meta for feature requests is more of a "agree/disagree" than a rep-gathering tool. Disagreeing (or agreeing) with a request after it's been declined already serves no purpose. – tvanfosson Jul 22 '10 at 16:51
1  
@tvan, one day the Team may reconsider an issue and go looking at old status-declined feature-requests related to it, or as has happened before, they may realized they tagged it wrong and remove the tag. – Lance Roberts Jul 22 '10 at 16:53

I follow the http://meta.stackoverflow.com/feeds/tag/status-completed+-retag-request feed to keep up with what new questions get tagged [status-completed]. When I see something useful has been implemented that I missed, I often upvote it as a way to "tip" the person who thought of it.

However, I do find it odd that I continue to get upvotes for some feature requests I made which were implemented over a year ago.

share|improve this answer
    
This is why I suggested a waiting period -- say 30 days -- before closing off votes. – tvanfosson Jul 22 '10 at 16:49

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .