Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I understand the danger of tactical downvoting. It's clearly gaming the system. But what about Community Wiki posts (on Meta, at least)? Nobody is there to gain rep; there is no reason anyone would possibly want to tactically downvote anything.

After witnessing active Meta activity in Area 51 sites, where the environment of the entire newly-formed website can change and shift drastically within the time span of even a few days, very important Community Wiki meta questions can see answers shift from extremely relevant and helpful to horribly irrelevant and even destructive to the progress of the developing community.

I'd perhaps like the ability to be able to change positions that I support over time, as the landscape of the issue changes drastically around me. And I really don't see any downside, honestly. If anyone has any, please point them out.

share|improve this question
Do I really have to give this a bounty? – Justin L. Jul 25 '10 at 5:01
I initially wanted to downvote this, but on second thought, I would like to see some examples of where questions have become irrelevant and/or destructive before I choose how to vote. – Pops Aug 27 '10 at 18:56
Having seen no examples after almost a month, -1. – Pops Sep 21 '10 at 16:23
up vote 1 down vote accepted

I would just like to point out: If it is community wiki, you can edit it (changing nothing) and change your vote.

share|improve this answer
Man ... I sound just like Jeff... – Tyler Carter Jul 23 '10 at 3:53
needz moar youtube linksss... – Shog9 Jul 23 '10 at 5:18

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .