Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I stumbled upon this question.

The person's English is obviously not good, yet the question is understandable and has two answers that make sense, too.

From these two answers I concluded such a question on SO would get edited and optionally upvoted. Yet that one currently has rating of -7 with no upvotes.

It feels just wrong to me. Is there a way to actually encourage the community to do the intended thing (editing) without downvoting absentmindedly?

share|improve this question
7×-2 + 13×5 = 51 rep instead of 30. Bad english pays! :P – badp Jul 24 '10 at 14:57
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Offering badges for editing is supposed to encourage people to edit, and charging rep for downvoting is supposed to discourage absentminded downvoting. It works for the most part, although it apparently didn't in that case

share|improve this answer

This shouldn't have happened.

A valid question getting downvoted this badly is a rather rare occurrence, maybe owing to the fact that it's the weekend, I don't know.

The correct policy is in fact to edit the question.

share|improve this answer

Crowdsourced moderation will screw up from time to time, and history suggests that this is one of the more common cases for screwing up.

Consider a gentle and aspecific chiding in the comments with links to appropriate meta discussions.

But also see Is atrocious English a possible sign of rudeness?.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .