What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 133 Stack Exchange communities.

Let's lay down a few axioms before debating:

  • Voting is sacred. It drives our community and is probably the single most important feature of our sites.
  • Unvoting, as well as voting, can be misused. Unvoting should not be allowed for everyone IMHO, as is the case of voting. A small degree of chaos might result.
  • Unvoting, as well as voting, should be done with care. This goes back to votes being sacred. In order for our content to have any meaning at all, voting should not be done carelessly.

Now that that foundation has been laid, we can examine some finer points, the foremost of which is that everyone learns. My experience may be very different than average because I was extremely ignorant of many things and posted several things during this period. I may have downvoted some answers that were amazing: well explained, and correct. The awesomeness of that content did not change, and if it did, we are free to rescind votes. However, our thoughts do change as we learn and explore. Votes are sacred, and not letting me change my vote is in some ways similar to not letting me vote at all.

Obviously, how this is implemented must be decided with care. The most important thing is that voting should not be done lightly, so this privilege should only be given to those who understand its ramifications and their responsibilities. I propose that we use 5k as the level where this privilege is gained, as it would help bridge the huge gap between 3k and 10k, although that's a completely different debate. Users with 2k rep already sort or have this privileges through editing the answer itself, but I've started running into this problem on other SE sites where I don't have enough rep.

This feature also rarely needs to be used, so a limit of 3 per day or a similar number would probably be in order. The number depends on how much we trust the users.

Sometimes when I've downvoted a post with a comment, the answerer responds with a comment that addresses something I wasn't aware of or didn't know. You guys are probably a lot smarter than me so this happens less, but I feel really bad when I can't undo that downvote

What does the community think? :D

share|improve this question
1  
Are you sure you didn't pick 5k because you are about to reach that milestone? ;-) –  James McNellis Jul 31 '10 at 3:09
    
I TOTALLY forgot about that!...better change it. :) –  Gordon Gustafson Jul 31 '10 at 3:10
3  
+1: I just wish I wouldn't have to wait that long to be able to do it, if it is ever implemented.... –  Vivi Jul 31 '10 at 4:40
    
This is too destabilizing I think. –  polygenelubricants Jul 31 '10 at 7:23
    
I don't think it's a good idea, but it's too late at night for me to write up a full devinb-worthy response so I'll just leave it at that. –  mmyers Jul 31 '10 at 7:47

1 Answer 1

Personally, I just edit the question when I want to rescind a vote. Not that I do that all the time; this usually happens after I do some research on the answer I find out I was wrong or just because the user adds a comment with a convincing explanation/disclaimer.

This is available to 2k users, so I don't see the need for this feature. It's kind of a word-around, but I've needed it maybe once, twice a month.

Perhaps a better feature would be to allow this to every one; it could be limited to 2 rescisions per question/answer.

share|improve this answer
5  
Editing a question just to change the vote, although an official solution to the problem, feels like a huge hack to me. –  Andreas Bonini Jul 31 '10 at 11:09

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .