Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I understand that currently moderators of any of the main sites are automatically made moderators of this site too. Once the various SE 2.0 sites progress out of beta and their permanent moderators are elected, this would suggest that those moderators would also get the same powers here. This could mean potentially hundreds of meta mods.

Should SE moderators be made moderators or should the status quo be maintained?

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Martijn Pieters, James, psubsee2003, mhlester, Patrick Hofman Apr 26 '15 at 21:51

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "The problem described here can no longer be reproduced. Changes to the system or to the circumstances affecting the asker have rendered it obsolete. If you encounter a similar problem, please post a new question." – Martijn Pieters, James, psubsee2003, Patrick Hofman
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

There are... A lot of moderators here already. You can't throw a brick around here without hitting a moderator or two. In their faces. Simultaneously. Packed cheek-to-cheek, that's how many moderators there are here. – Shog9 Aug 1 '10 at 19:34
I agree, hence the question. Jeff's response sums it up nicely and makes sense. – Rich Seller Aug 1 '10 at 19:37
up vote 8 down vote accepted

The current plan is that only trilogy moderators are made moderators here on

Because each new site has its own per-site meta (including Server Fault and Super User), that is no longer true.

The current list of moderators will probably be grandfathered in, but we won't add any more.

share|improve this answer
Thanks for the swift response. – Rich Seller Aug 1 '10 at 19:32
What's a 'trilogy mod' or a 'trilogy site'? – YatharthROCK Sep 10 '12 at 17:20
What do you mean by 'grandfathered in'? – YatharthROCK Sep 10 '12 at 17:20
@YatharthROCK A trilogy site is one of Stack Overflow, Super User or Server Fault. – Matt Ellen Sep 10 '12 at 18:28

Meta SO is a separate community. We talk about problems on StackOverflow and problems with the site system. We therefore elect moderators with the thought that they will be able to moderate conversation regarding that.

SE Site Moderators are elected with different responsibilities. SE Site Moderators are elected with the thought that they will be able to moderate conversation regarding their own individual topic.

SE Site Moderators are not elect to moderate the conversations that happen on MSO, and vice versa. Therefore the two should remain separate.

Besides, there would be too many chiefs.

share|improve this answer
My point is that all existing SU/SF/SO moderators are also meta moderators, so if the precedent was followed the SE moderators would be too. I think that's unwise and wanted to understand what the position was. I'm glad to see they've thought about this and it won't be the case – Rich Seller Aug 1 '10 at 19:45

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .