Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Notation for equations doesn't work on, like it does on As I can see both sites are use the same engine (both are part of the stackexchage), so why I couldn't write something like $\frac{4}{3}\pi r^3$ as in this question?

I'm aware about this solution, but I can't see any reason to use 3rd-party solution when there's a ready one on

share|improve this question
Sorry for the shortlived, incorrect edit. Mea culpa. – dmckee Aug 4 '10 at 18:25

LaTeX is only enabled on Mathematics and Statical Analysis (AFAIK), but nowhere else. This is a good thing, since parsing LaTeX equations is resource intensive (on the client side). On sites where mathematical formula aren't used a lot, having LaTeX turned on is just a waste.

For simple enough equations, just use HTML, e.g. 4πr3/3.

share|improve this answer
Why? Programming related questions and answers are sometimes need formulas. – Kirill V. Lyadvinsky Aug 4 '10 at 18:33
@jia, I have never come across a programming question that requires the display of complex mathematical equations. Can you back this up with examples? – Aarobot Aug 4 '10 at 18:43
Without digging now, consider (non-trivial) questions about complexity or 3D-graphics. – Georg Fritzsche Aug 4 '10 at 19:02
@Georg: These are not the majority of questions asked on SO. You can't even find them in the top-80 tags (maybe [algorithm] counts, but that's still not many.) – kennytm Aug 4 '10 at 19:26
@Kenny: I didn't say anything about proportionality - i just reacted to Aarobots "I have never come across [...]". – Georg Fritzsche Aug 4 '10 at 19:50
@Georg - I agree. I hate having to do O(n<sup>2</sup>), so it doesn't even have to be non-trivial. – tvanfosson Aug 4 '10 at 21:04
@KennyTM, look "Unicode art is not enough for not-so-simple equations." link. I agree that such questions is not the majority on SO, but even one such question worth to turn this option on. I'm not sure it is a big waste of computational resources. I'm not a web developer and I like LaTeX syntax, HTML is not for me. – Kirill V. Lyadvinsky Aug 5 '10 at 12:06
@jia: When I say not-so-simple equations I mean equations like…, not trivial things like O(n²). And please time how long until the page is fully loaded. And also consider the extra bandwidth it will take for something like maybe 1% of question will actually use. – kennytm Aug 5 '10 at 12:40
But the extra-bandwidth would only be needed for that minority of questions, thus it wouldn't hurt much anyway? – Georg Fritzsche Aug 5 '10 at 20:33
@KennyTM: It is. It has to be parsed client side by Javascript, just like the (noticeably slow at times) syntax highlighter. – Macha Sep 4 '10 at 13:52
@Georg: How would you programmatically detect it is needed? You don't want to hardcode in tag names. And it's at least a 100kb script (broken into several files), which would add a rather significant amount of data to serve. – Macha Sep 4 '10 at 13:56
@Macha: If one of the requested posts uses the markup? – Georg Fritzsche Sep 4 '10 at 14:07
@Georg: How do you programmaticaly detect that it's using the markup? How do you even know it wants the markup parsed and displayed? It might be a question about making a LaTeX parser. – Macha Sep 4 '10 at 22:01
@Macha: The same way the script used on does it? Or use special tags or whatever makes the engine happy... If it was a server-side solution its obious anyway. – Georg Fritzsche Sep 4 '10 at 22:55

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .