Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

This is a follow up to this feature request which was not well received.

According to the default/empty tag-wiki page:

Tag wikis can be edited by users with more than 2000 reputation, provided:

  1. They are in the top 20 answerers for this tag or
  2. They have more than 100 answer upvotes in this tag

Do you agree with this reputation/upvote requirement (which is significantly above the CW editing requirement)? If not, what should be required to edit tag-wiki?

share|improve this question
Is this still valid? It now says you must have a "score" of more than 100 in a tag. What does "score" mean and how does it differ from upvotes? – NullUserException อ_อ Sep 14 '10 at 4:19
Score=upvotes-downvotes – waffles Sep 14 '10 at 4:26

I do agree with it. Community-wiki is designed specifically to allow more people to edit the post than would otherwise be able to; tag-wikis are not that way despite having "wiki" in the name, they have considerably more visibility than a single question. Needing to edit one should be fairly rare I would expect; if you do need to add something that's not already there you probably already have the 100 upvotes/2000 reputation needed

share|improve this answer
And, as mentioned in the linked question, if you don't meet the requirements you can also bring it up on meta. – Georg Fritzsche Aug 6 '10 at 5:37
I'd agree with Michael. – KMan Aug 6 '10 at 5:54
Just now, with the feature being new, a lot of the tag wiki do need editing. They should settle down pretty quickly, but... – dmckee Aug 6 '10 at 13:42

After being implemented for a few months, the tag-wiki pages are relatively concise and short.


If the purpose of tag-wiki is to give a very brief overview of the tag at hand, then the current rep requirement is fine. If however, we hope to make a comprehensive, authoritative, well sourced and well linked learning resource, then I believe editing privileges should be opened up to the general public wikipedia-style (or at least the rep requirement should be significantly lower).

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .