What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 131 Stack Exchange communities.

This is a follow up to this feature request which was not well received.

According to the default/empty tag-wiki page:

Tag wikis can be edited by users with more than 2000 reputation, provided:

  1. They are in the top 20 answerers for this tag or
  2. They have more than 100 answer upvotes in this tag

Do you agree with this reputation/upvote requirement (which is significantly above the CW editing requirement)? If not, what should be required to edit tag-wiki?

share|improve this question
    
Is this still valid? It now says you must have a "score" of more than 100 in a tag. What does "score" mean and how does it differ from upvotes? –  NullUserException อ_อ Sep 14 '10 at 4:19
2  
Score=upvotes-downvotes –  waffles Sep 14 '10 at 4:26

2 Answers 2

I do agree with it. Community-wiki is designed specifically to allow more people to edit the post than would otherwise be able to; tag-wikis are not that way despite having "wiki" in the name, they have considerably more visibility than a single question. Needing to edit one should be fairly rare I would expect; if you do need to add something that's not already there you probably already have the 100 upvotes/2000 reputation needed

share|improve this answer
    
And, as mentioned in the linked question, if you don't meet the requirements you can also bring it up on meta. –  Georg Fritzsche Aug 6 '10 at 5:37
    
I'd agree with Michael. –  KMan Aug 6 '10 at 5:54
1  
Just now, with the feature being new, a lot of the tag wiki do need editing. They should settle down pretty quickly, but... –  dmckee Aug 6 '10 at 13:42

After being implemented for a few months, the tag-wiki pages are relatively concise and short.

IMHO:

If the purpose of tag-wiki is to give a very brief overview of the tag at hand, then the current rep requirement is fine. If however, we hope to make a comprehensive, authoritative, well sourced and well linked learning resource, then I believe editing privileges should be opened up to the general public wikipedia-style (or at least the rep requirement should be significantly lower).

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .