I don't have raw numbers, but a quick glance around shows me that people are continuning to vote on questions that have already been deemed as either on-topic, off-topic, or a bad example by the community. These people might not realize this, either. So instead of allowing people to vote on questions that are already categorized, can it be locked so that they have to vote on another question? I think this might help the sites stuck in the definition phase, too. As new people come, they'll only vote on questions that need to be voted on.
What is meta?
- Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
- The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
- Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates
What would happen if a question gained the 20 votes needed to be classified as "on topic" but then someone decided it wasn't a good example and wanted to vote it as either "off topic" or (more likely) "not a good example"?
Wouldn't they be prevented from doing so by locking?
Or are you proposing that only "on topic" votes (for example) be blocked? In this case you'd have to continually check that the question still met the criteria and unblock votes if necessary.
It seems a lot of work for very little gain.