Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 153 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I know the "Links" section is recommended to track duplicates, but I feel it doesn't go far enough because it doesn't list all the duplicates, and moreover, it makes it hard to find the question.

Rather than link two questions together, a real duplicate link should add the question to a group of duplicates. Whenever a question is a member of such a duplicate group, all other duplicates would be listed in the right pane, along with the question vote count, sorted by the votes.

Advantages:

  • Easy navigation among duplicates
  • Extra incentive for voting on questions
  • Extra incentive for properly linking real duplicates (example of unlinked that would benefit)
  • Better motivation for only closing as exact duplicate when a question is an exact duplicate and not merely somewhat related.

Disadvantages:

  • significant implementation effort

Example:

Example of a question that would benefit: What programming language for a beginner? [closed]

The Linked section contains a single other duplicate (out of 12 links, i.e. <10% signal to noise), and then recursively apply this algorithm. After a while I discovered these duplicates:

At which point I started to get lost in my recursive search, because I kept stumbling across questions I've already found and the signal-to-noise (w.r.t duplicates!) in the Linked section was consistently very low.

This feature would have encouraged people to actually use the duplicates rather than re-ask a question after stumbling across one like this one.

Notes:

  • I'm not suggesting that the Link section should go. I'm just saying its purpose is orthogonal (but superficially similar) to linking duplicates together.
share|improve this question
    
The "duplicate section" is an interesting idea, but a note. The linked section isn't just for Duplicates, but for anything related that gets linked. A lot of us use it, especially in Metas here and in SE2.0, to give quick access to non-dupe related conversations from the past. It's very convenient for that. – Grace Note Aug 10 '10 at 12:54
    
@(Grace Note) I got the wrong impression about what Linked was trying to address then, but I'm certainly not suggesting that it be removed :) – romkyns Aug 11 '10 at 11:11
    
@Grace Note thanks; I thought the opposite used to be the case... – romkyns Aug 11 '10 at 11:53

Links was not created to list duplicates.

It's for questions that are linked to the current question in either direction.

The Linked sidebar is very straightforward: it gathers up any links to this question provided by the community via comments, answers, or questions, and presents them in simple list format on the right-hand side of the question. It’s important to note that these links are bi-directional — that is, if another question links to this one, the link will be listed on both questions.

http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/04/new-linked-posts/

share|improve this answer
2  
This answer does not address the feature request in any way (not even the subject line). Perhaps you meant to post this as a comment? – Timwi Aug 11 '10 at 11:12
up vote 1 down vote accepted

It would really help if "status-declined" came with comments. Even connect.microsoft.com posts comments for their "closed" results.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .