This question is using in the programming sense, while this question, also tagged , is asking about the way a feature on stackoverflow.com is implemented.

I suggest creating a new tag, , for questions about how things on our favorite website are implemented and leaving for people who have problems with memory management.

It appears this question addresses what I am asking for, but has no definitive answer other than "fix it yourself."

share|improve this question
1  
or fixed even more succinctly, [stackoverflow] for the website, and [stack-overflow] for the memory error. –  James Aug 10 '10 at 15:59
4  
I think that leads to more confusion. As a newcomer how would I differentiate between [stackoverflow] and [stack-overflow]? Choosing [stack-overflow] and [stackoverflow.com] as per your original suggestion offers much more clarity. –  Mark Elliot Aug 10 '10 at 16:18
    
I just posted this, before I saw your question, but I believe we're proposing different solutions to similar problems. –  Ether Aug 10 '10 at 16:50
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 2 down vote accepted

You are approaching this the wrong way: new users will always use the stackoverflow tag to refer to either the website or the error, so no matter what you do that tag is doomed.

I have a better idea: rename the website to http://www.wafflesoverflow.com; this will solve the tag problem. The domain is not currently registered.

share|improve this answer
    
That was what i was thinking, the name of the website is the redefinition –  James Aug 10 '10 at 17:06
add comment

i think that the best, most clear way to set it up for newcomers and old is to roll all stackoverflow the website tagged questions into a tag [stackoverflow.com] and roll all stackoverflow the exception into [stackoverflow] and [stack-overflow]

share|improve this answer
    
That won't happen if you're doing an actual tag search. –  Grace Note Aug 10 '10 at 18:47
    
i have to bracket? i guess that makes sense. My bad. –  James Aug 10 '10 at 19:16
    
The tag wiki now agrees with you, but it hasn't stopped people from using [stackoverflow] for both meanings. –  Pops Sep 28 '11 at 16:48
add comment

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .