What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 130 Stack Exchange communities.

I see that stack-overflow is now a synonym for [stackoverflow]. I strongly object to this, as historically:

  • [stackoverflow] means the site itself (indeed almost all questions with this tag have been migrated to meta)
  • [stack-overflow] means the stack overflow exception, as in numerous languages and operating systems.

I monitor the [stackoverflow] tag so I can vote to migrate meta questions, and have been retagging any such questions that are actually pertaining to the exception type. Please remove this synonym.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Martijn Pieters, Shadow Wizard, doppelgreener, mmyers, mhlester Jul 2 at 16:07

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – Martijn Pieters, Shadow Wizard, doppelgreener, mmyers, mhlester
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1  
Presumably someone made the unification because they thought in an ideal world there'd be no meta questions on SO. In addition to liking the hyphenated version better for the programming phenomenon, I think that creating the synonym is a fail because it removes the ability to notice (via automated or manual mechanisms) when someone has tagged a question with "stackoverflow" w/o reading the tag description. You currently cannot tag browse for questions about actual stack-overflows without seeing a lot of garbage...even migrated questions you can't edit are showing up, this needs to get fixed! –  HostileFork Nov 10 '11 at 18:44
    
Quoted from the current [stackoverflow] tag: Do not use this tag to refer to the Stack Overflow website. Use the "stackoverflow.com" tag. –  Nightfirecat Nov 17 '11 at 3:32
    
@Nightfirecat It's repeatedly demonstrated that people are not paying attention to that, and there's not a good automatic way of forcing them to pay attention. Those asking about actual stack overflows are far more likely to be computer sophisticates and have attention to details like the tag text (as opposed to the folks with questions like "I want to make programming website and make big bucks. How does stackoverflow make money, so I can make it too?") –  HostileFork Nov 22 '11 at 15:55

2 Answers 2

Weirdly, I think this synonym should be reversed, so it's [stackoverflow] --> [stack-overflow].

A tag that categorizes questions about Stack Overflow doesn't belong on Stack Overflow (those questions belong on Meta, of course). So it ends up being a metatag, which as we've seen recently, is disallowed by policy.

Obviously that doesn't stop users from asking questions in the wrong place, but at the same time I think it's unreasonable to expect users (especially new ones) to be able to distinguish between the two tags.

If you're monitoring questions for metaquestions, the way I'm proposing means you only need to follow 1 tag, and not do any retagging, as when the question gets migrated, there's a good chance it will be retagged anyway (and we can put [stack-overflow] --> [stackoverflow] here on Meta).

share|improve this answer
1  
what about a case where a user asks programmatically about a feature of the stackoverflow website? –  James Aug 10 '10 at 17:16
1  
@James: "How does Stack Overflow work?" belongs on Meta; "How does <x> work? For example, on Stack Overflow?" is fine for Stack Overflow because another example could be substituted. There's no need to categorize questions by the examples since any example could be put in the question. –  Jon Seigel Aug 10 '10 at 17:19
2  
As suggested before (will add link when I find it), IMHO anyone attempting to tag a question "stackoverflow" (or a variant) should be prompted "is this question about the SO site itself? If so, please direct it to meta". Only if we do this do I think it would be appropriate to disable one variant of this tag (where adding a synonym counts as disabling). –  Ether Aug 10 '10 at 17:20
    
@Ether: I support that, for sure. Jeff may see it as simply a corner case, though. I think implementing tag synonym auditing would be a good first step towards that. –  Jon Seigel Aug 10 '10 at 17:22
2  
@Ether You suggested it here. –  Grace Note Aug 10 '10 at 18:41
    
@Grace: thanks! I totally forgot that it was me who suggested it, and I got called away (darned $work). :D –  Ether Aug 11 '10 at 3:10
    
Kinda got a point with wanting a dash in there, but a dash is kinda-unnecessary. –  bobobobo Nov 16 '11 at 21:40
    
Well...my attempt at using a bounty to raise attention to an issue didn't work to raise attention by the expiration of the bounty...so I made a new question...it would be nice if the broken tag browsing were solved somehow: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/112439/… –  HostileFork Nov 17 '11 at 3:26

Questions about Stackoverflow belong on meta. I don't think the difference between [stackoverflow] and [stack-overflow] would be apparent, especially to a user that doesn't know to ask on MSO. If you see a question tagged [stack[-]overflow], just vote to migrate to meta.

share|improve this answer
3  
Uh, no. You have make sure they are talking about the site before you vote to migrate here -- not just look at the tags! –  SamB Nov 27 '10 at 0:30
    
I guess I had hoped that part was implied. –  user27414 Nov 27 '10 at 1:42

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .