Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

This discussion is prompted by this question: Why is the 'newbie' tag not allowed?

There are two reasons for not allowing a newbie tag:

  1. It is a meta-tag.
  2. It is often used in a pejorative way.

I'm interested in reason number 2. If a tag is disallowed only for the reason that it might be used in a pejorative way, would it make sense to allow authors to tag their own posts with it? At first glance, it seems to make sense.

[Note that in this particular case, the tag would still be disallowed for being a meta-tag. I'm only using newbie as an example here, I'm more interested in the general principle. But read on for a discussion on meta-ness.]

However: what would the list of such tags be? Specifically, would such tags necessarily be about the author and not the content of the question an thus automatically be meta-tags?

share|improve this question
I have to say, I find the view of "newbie" as being pejorative kind of interesting. Not that I don't understand it, certainly, but these days the people I see who would use it pejoratively are all illiterate and use renderings such as "n00b". Those using the term "newbie" aren't usually doing so in a particularly mean-spirited way. – Nicholas Knight Aug 13 '10 at 12:17
@Nicholas Play counter-strike: this will change your mind ;) – ereOn Aug 13 '10 at 12:28
up vote 7 down vote accepted

We tag questions, not the skill level or character of the asker.

A tag only available for the asker, does not look like a good tag to describe the content of the question. So skip it!

share|improve this answer

This has nothing to do with it being a derogatory term. It is just a stone cold meta tag, belonging the 'beginner' class of tags. It is utterly useless as a tag to filter questions that might be interesting:

  • newbies can ask very interesting questions because they don't know the dogma.
  • I'm a very experienced programmer but will always be a Perl newbie. You don't have to talk slow to answer one of my Perl questions.
  • 95% of all C# programmers are newbies when you use the Jon Skeet Measure.

It's a self-esteem tag. I'm interested in the question, not what you think of yourself.

share|improve this answer
Based on this logic, there should be no Intro CS classes or Beginning Python Programming books or Learning Haskell videos or Starting with Vim sites. As a hobbyist programmer, I found the beginner tag very helpful and have yet to find a way to find the same content as efficiently as before the tag was abolished. – timepilot Sep 17 '10 at 18:12

To me, a pejorative tag is always subjective (and thus a meta-tag) since you give your opinion.

I see this as a good reason for not allowing them.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .