Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I just tried to retag this question with the functional-programming tag, since it clearly relates to that. Imagine my surprise to be told that

sorry, the 'functional-programming' tag is not allowed.

Does this mean that functional-programming is now considered a banned meta-tag? Surely not - this is a style of programming, not a style of question.

share|improve this question
3  
Surely not. There are 1050 questions tagged [functional-programming] and 3185 questions tagged [oop]. [design-patterns] is still a valid tag, as is [oop] – Robert Harvey Aug 25 '10 at 10:57
4  
Hmm..possibly an overly strong reaction [feedback Ban programming as a tag on Stack Overflow ](meta.stackexchange.com/questions/61822/…)? – dmckee Aug 25 '10 at 11:06
1  
Confirmed, I can't retag [functional] -> [functional-programming]. I wonder if [*programming] or its equivalent was banned when this was implemented? – Bill the Lizard Aug 25 '10 at 11:10
    
@dmckee: Agree with banning [programming], but not [functional-programming]. – Robert Harvey Aug 25 '10 at 11:11
4  
What about [parallel-programming]? Is that banned too? – ChrisF Aug 25 '10 at 11:31
1  
@ChrisF: Yes, it looks like [parallel-programming] is banned as well. – Bill the Lizard Aug 25 '10 at 12:01
2  
As is [pair-programming] – skaffman Aug 25 '10 at 12:06
2  
@Bill: [ajsskdfhprogramming] and [programmingksdjfhskjfh] also aren't allowed, so it's definitely a match for *programming*. – sth Aug 25 '10 at 19:17
    
Jeff made the rule more restrictive, so we're back in business. – Bill the Lizard Aug 25 '10 at 22:10
up vote 7 down vote accepted

I would flag your question for moderator attention and see if they can remove [functional-programming] from the blacklist. [functional-programming] does not meet Jeff's criteria for a meta-tag.

share|improve this answer
    
Some of these do meet one criterion for a meta-tag: meaning different things to different people. This would be especially true for [object-oriented-programming], of course. – David Thornley Aug 25 '10 at 15:22

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .