Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 155 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I like this new "about" statement for all tags. It makes them more defined. So what should it say for the [security] tag? I just put "This tag is used for topics relating to attacks against software.", but you might disagree. What are your thoughts?

share|improve this question

I want to say that there's more to security than just 'attacks', but then when I go through various counter-examples, it ends up being in part related to attacks. It still has slightly the wrong emphasis, so maybe:

  • The security tag is used for questions relating to attacks on software and how write programs to ensure that attacks are not successful.

With, maybe, a caveat that 'recovering from a successful attack is more appropriately discussed on ServerFault or SuperUser'.

share|improve this answer
    
+1 good suggestion. – Rook Aug 25 '10 at 22:46

I think that algorithm types relating to security should be mentioned.

I'm not sure what the broad categories are, maybe things like encryption (hashing, salting...),captchas?, random number generation.... Just 3 or so broad and important categories.

share|improve this answer
    
+1 i agree to an extent, there is actually a cryptography and encryption and there is a lot of overlap. For instance encryption always relates to cryptography and both always relate to security, but i don't think SO allows us to build such a relation tree.... – Rook Aug 25 '10 at 22:49

Maybe the tag info page should, as a subset, contain links to the things most likely to interest newbies and people looking for urgent help: Links to the best "So your site's been hacked" type of resources (and if most of the answers to that question are on serverfault - then link there.)

share|improve this answer
    
+1 i agree there are some panicked posts. – Rook Aug 25 '10 at 22:48
    
@Pekka, you mean like an faq, stackoverflow.com/tags/security/faq that is linked below the description? – waffles Aug 25 '10 at 22:51
    
@waffles basically yes, but most "my site's been hacked" questions are over on serverfault, and won't turn up in the SO security faq. Those would require some sort of a manually edited list – Pëkka Aug 25 '10 at 22:55
    
@Pekka I'm not sure we want to use that space to drive users to other sites, but you do raise an interesting point / concept ... ability to browse another sites questions/answers on the same tag (provided they are close) – waffles Aug 25 '10 at 23:49
    
@Pekka ... also I do not think these lists are interesting when mixed ... serverfault.com/tags/security/faq superuser.com/tags/security/faq stackoverflow.com/tags/security/faq – waffles Aug 25 '10 at 23:54
    
@waffles i agree to a large extent mainly because it takes a programmer to write a patch. Sure a sys admin can clean up the infection, but he is just going to get hacked again. shrug – Rook Aug 26 '10 at 0:03

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .