What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 129 Stack Exchange communities.

Currently, the tag [reportingservices] is synonym of [reporting-services], but with the years e.g. [reporting-services-2005] becomes a synonym of [reportingservices-2005] instead. This is inconsistent.

Please reverse the synonym direction of some of these pairs. I think [reporting-services-200x] is canonical.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by psubsee2003, Shadow Wizard, Stijn, rene, mmyers Jul 14 at 15:18

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – psubsee2003, Shadow Wizard, Stijn, rene, mmyers
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

2 Answers 2

Also, [ssrs-2008] should be a synonym of [reporting-services-2008], not the other way around.

It is proposed at the moment in the wrong direction since you don't have a choice about that when proposing a synonym. That's also how the other synonyms ended up so inconsistently.

share|improve this answer

I was going to post this as a comment, but it was just too messy. We have:

We also have , which appears to be the same as .

Then we also have and which have the same tag wiki entry stating they're for SQL Server 2008 R2 reporting services.

Finally, there's , which appears to be the same as .

So I think we need the following core tags, with the tags in parentheses merged in:

Alternately, they can all start with ssrs-[year] if people think that makes more sense.

share|improve this answer
    
This is great, but I would add that's it's important to keep 2008 and 2008R2 as separate tags; the functionality between releases is different enough that it's useful to be able to differentiate between the two. –  Ian Preston Aug 7 '13 at 16:04
    
@IanPreston - you're most likely right, I skipped over SSRS-2008 (and R2) when they came out. I know there's a fair difference between SQL Server 2008 and SQL Server 2008R2, but I was trusting the tag wiki in this case, which was probably a bad idea. –  LittleBobbyTables Aug 7 '13 at 16:17

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .