Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 153 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Currently, the tag [reportingservices] is synonym of [reporting-services], but with the years e.g. [reporting-services-2005] becomes a synonym of [reportingservices-2005] instead. This is inconsistent.

Please reverse the synonym direction of some of these pairs. I think [reporting-services-200x] is canonical.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by psubsee2003, Shadow Wizard, Stijn, rene, mmyers Jul 14 '14 at 15:18

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – psubsee2003, Shadow Wizard, Stijn, rene, mmyers
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Also, [ssrs-2008] should be a synonym of [reporting-services-2008], not the other way around.

It is proposed at the moment in the wrong direction since you don't have a choice about that when proposing a synonym. That's also how the other synonyms ended up so inconsistently.

share|improve this answer

I was going to post this as a comment, but it was just too messy. We have:

We also have , which appears to be the same as .

Then we also have and which have the same tag wiki entry stating they're for SQL Server 2008 R2 reporting services.

Finally, there's , which appears to be the same as .

So I think we need the following core tags, with the tags in parentheses merged in:

Alternately, they can all start with ssrs-[year] if people think that makes more sense.

share|improve this answer
    
This is great, but I would add that's it's important to keep 2008 and 2008R2 as separate tags; the functionality between releases is different enough that it's useful to be able to differentiate between the two. – Ian Preston Aug 7 '13 at 16:04
    
@IanPreston - you're most likely right, I skipped over SSRS-2008 (and R2) when they came out. I know there's a fair difference between SQL Server 2008 and SQL Server 2008R2, but I was trusting the tag wiki in this case, which was probably a bad idea. – LittleBobbyTables Aug 7 '13 at 16:17

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .