Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

One would think only a moderator should be able to mess with moderator tags.

P.S.: I was also able to reapply it during a rollback. So, actually I was able to both delete and apply a moderator tag.

3: Again, I rolled it back. It's no longer tagged "status-completed". Not trying to be an effer here, just don't think I should be allowed to do that.

share|improve this question
I don't think reapplying it via a rollback is that big of an issue, since it had to be initially applied by a moderator. – Kyle Cronin Jul 16 '09 at 22:41
I just thought I'd mention it. If a mod removes a mod tag, I should not be able to reapply it with a rollback. – raven Jul 16 '09 at 22:43
It's witchery what this rollback loop-hole is! @jon – random Jul 12 '10 at 2:55
Well, at least if we discover that something isn't actually complete, we can annoy Jeff to fix it by continually rolling back the [status-completed] tag. ;) @random – Jon Seigel Jul 12 '10 at 2:59
Is this question getting to be the town bike? – random Jul 12 '10 at 23:37
meta deployed ... roll back this tag if you can :) – waffles May 30 '11 at 7:13
@JonSeigel: That use case is rather singular ;-P. – SamB Feb 13 '12 at 18:51
up vote 11 down vote accepted

I just fixed this old, old, old bug.

share|improve this answer
BAH!!! ........+1 – Jon Seigel May 30 '11 at 17:23

I was able to. Seems like a bug. I think it's intentional that non-moderators are not able to add them. I just would think that a non-moderator shouldn't be able to remove them as well. I believe the whole point is for moderators only to be able to provide status of feature requests and bugs.

share|improve this answer
But I could not ADD a moderator only tag. I feel like that's persecuting the under-priviledged. – devinb Jul 16 '09 at 21:09
Well whatddya know. Yea that seems like a bug. – Tom Ritter Jul 16 '09 at 21:09
@devinb: kinda the point, yes... – SamB Nov 27 '10 at 2:58

I think it's actually by (accidental) design - if that makes any sense.

On uservoice, users were able to re-open a ticket. It just wasn't obvious how, or even that it was possible. From the users' perspective closed tickets tended to just disappear, even though the url was still good.

share|improve this answer
this is not by design – Jeff Atwood Jul 16 '09 at 21:18
Ha. Good guess though Joel. – jjnguy Jul 16 '09 at 21:36

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .