Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 153 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

EDIT: a fast acting moderator deleted the user's post (and his rep is at 1 again) but, for reference, the user's profile is at

This user asked the following blatantly off-topic question:

alt text

This is his only question and he has 6 down votes (including mine) and no up votes. Checking his reputation history shows only the -12 from those 6 down votes. His reputation was actually higher than this before he got a few more down votes.

I do have a theory, that he was down voted when he posted the question and then several votes were removed by users within the 5 minute limit. Would this cause a rep refund of 2 points, even though the user lost no rep? Is it a potential exploit for gaining rep (if enough sock puppets were used)?

share|improve this question
Though, as it seems, it's a spammer. The User 'Mubi' is answering the question in a very interesting way, and with a link which fits astonishing good to the question. I'll flag it. – Time Traveling Bobby Sep 8 '10 at 11:36
A moot point now that I've destroyed both ;p – Marc Gravell Sep 8 '10 at 12:57
up vote 12 down vote accepted

When a down-vote is removed 2 points are added to the rep total even if the rep was at 1.

So in this case 7 people down-vote and the rep remains at 1.

One person removes their down-vote and 2 is added giving a rep of 3 and leaving 6 down-votes.

If you remove your down-vote the rep will increase to 5 (I think).

Update: this is no longer the case, downvote reversals will restore the correct (if any) reputation.

share|improve this answer
Tested and confirmed. That is weird... Aha, it's of course status-bydesign. – Georg Fritzsche Sep 8 '10 at 11:38
@Georg - thanks for finding the link! – ChrisF Sep 8 '10 at 11:45
@Georg, @ChrisF: Then my theory was correct, although as I said in the question, he had more rep than that before I down voted and noticed, which makes me wonder if this was some kind of crazy experiment involving sock puppets. – Andy E Sep 8 '10 at 11:54
@Andy Well, it's practicaly impossible to abuse that to gain any kind of reputation. The difference between 1 & 3 reputation is trivial. – HoLyVieR Sep 8 '10 at 12:28
@HoLy: I realize that, of course. It would take an astounding amount of effort to pull something big like instantly gaining 100 reputation, I was just thinking that this particular incident seemed like a bit of an experiment. – Andy E Sep 8 '10 at 12:36
@Georg - Does that still apply? – Peter Ajtai Sep 8 '10 at 16:43
@Peter: That is a different corner-case which didn't apply here - my removed down-vote gave the user the 2 additional rep, ergo 1 → 1 → 3. – Georg Fritzsche Sep 8 '10 at 16:50

May be he accepted an answer on another question that got subsequently deleted.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .