Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I think it would be nice if, for our notification inbox, we could delete notifications after we've read them. Just for organizational purposes. (And if that gets added, perhaps the filter by date function could be removed for it.)

share|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

I approve of this suggestion because I would really like to be able to manage what I do at work separately from what I do at home. I'm happy to deal with SO, P.SX and other work related SX sites at work, but many other SX sites are just for personal interest and it wouldn't be appropriate to deal with them on work time.

I would love it if Inbox notifications were only 'marked as read' when I actually clicked on them. At the moment, if you click on any of the Inbox items, they all stop being highlighted (are marked as Read in UX terms).

That way I would be able to ignore non-work related notifications during the day, and have all my non work notifications still highlighted when I get home. Similarly, while at home I could ignore work related notifications, and have them all still highlighted when I get to work the next day.

share|improve this answer

workaround: You can use the RSS-feed of a question instead of using the star, and your favourite RSS-reader will certainly have this feature

share|improve this answer
Did you bump this question down one or was that someone else? I don't want to download an RSS feeder, then subscribe manually to each and every question I reply to, whereas this idea could just be implemented :S – TGP1994 Sep 9 '10 at 19:57
@TGP1994: in fact I +1'ed you, and as I mentioned this answer would only be a work-around. I don't -1 without comments usually. – Tobias Kienzler Sep 10 '10 at 7:31
Oh, thank you very much then :) I apologize if I came at a bad angle there. I wish that the -1 person explains why they think it's bad. – TGP1994 Sep 10 '10 at 19:37
@TGP1994: I guess they want to state something like "I don't think this is important enough to take the developers time" – Tobias Kienzler Sep 13 '10 at 8:24
@TGP Meta works differently than SO in terms of downvotes. A downvote here is a mere sign of disagreement, it's not necessarily an indication that something is wrong with your question or answer. It's closer to an actual voting process - "do you want this, or not"? – Pëkka Apr 25 '11 at 15:54
Actually, one should then better use the responses feed rather than a question feed. One other advantage: it shows a much longer summary, not just the first few characters. See your user profile, tab Responses, bottom right corner, @TGP. – Arjan Apr 25 '11 at 16:57

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .