Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I see that many legitimate proposals are closed very quickly (often by the same people). Why? Shouldn't some more time be given to proposals?

For instance, take this one: http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/21699/psychologist-for-programmers

A spoof? Possible.

Will eventually not result in a useful, productive, or viable Q&A site? Almost sure.

However, closing it in such a short time after the creation seems just excess of zealotry to me.

share|improve this question
3  
From your description, I was expecting a timeframe of maybe 30 minutes, not the two days that it actually was. – mmyers Sep 30 '10 at 22:07
3  
"Don't you think it's a bit dangerous to get advice from programmers of all people about fighting depression and other psychological problems? shouldn't you look for advice from, I don't know, maybe a psychotherapist? (I'm going to have a programmer fix the breaks on my car now, auto mechanics are over-rated)" that's the actual problem with this proposal, even when cars are run by computers. – alexanderpas Sep 30 '10 at 22:21

If it were done when 'tis done, then 'twere well it were done quickly.

Personally, I would rather they close sites quickly, if they're going to at all - so people don't invest a lot of time in them.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .