Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Looks like Serverfault is going to take a long time to hit even a paltry 10000 questions although the quality has been superb. Superuser is less than a week old and has over 1000 questions.

In one year, what do you think the number of questions on SuperUser and ServerFault will be and why?

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by animuson, Lucifer, Hugo Dozois, Martijn Pieters, ben is uǝq backwards Jun 16 '13 at 9:36

  • This question does not appear to be about the software that powers the Stack Exchange network within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

well, a year later the number of questions are about the same, right around 55K each – roman m Oct 13 '10 at 0:58
This question appears to be off-topic because it is about two specific sites on the network not related to Stack Overflow or the network as a whole. – animuson Jun 15 '13 at 18:51
up vote 1 down vote accepted

The clever sysadmins are probably too busy to dilly dally on forums, cleaning up after code monkeys rep whoring on stackoverflow. Code monkey are, of course, all super users.

Seriously, I find serverfault a lot harder to follow then meta or SO. A combination of exotic technical stuff and less clear tags.

Relating to my main skills, SQL Server, I usually find Paul Randall has cleaned up already. Who am I to answer a log or DBCC question after Him?

share|improve this answer
Wow, that Paul Randall looks like quite an impressive character. – Peter Turner Jul 20 '09 at 19:49

I think SuperUser is going to definitely surpass ServerFault in terms of page views, questions, and overall activity. This is directly because of the subject matters. ServerFault has a lot of highly technical subject matter that will only work for people with a lot of SysAdmin type experience. SuperUser questions are going to be a lot easier for your typical computer power users to be able to answer.

share|improve this answer
Will you count also the close ones? I am expecting that after the first two weeks the ratio of closed questions will be much higher than SU and SO – Drake Jul 17 '09 at 19:33
The amount of stuff that gets on SO will be much higher and the ratio will remain that way because it has a more narrow focus, so things will undoubtedly get closed a lot more often. SU will have a lot broader range of accepted types of questions, which means fewer closings. Now things that get moved to community wiki, that is a COMPLETELY different matter. – TheTXI Jul 17 '09 at 19:38

I'll second TheTXI's answer.

I asked this question on Server Fault and got one (not particularly helpful) answer a day later and then nothing.

I asked the same question on Super User and got an answer the same day.

Admittedly it's not particularly scientific, but it does illustrate TheTXI's point about the audience for each site.

share|improve this answer
Wow, that's not probably what the guys who made the site would want to see, I'd think an IIS question does belong on ServerFault. – Peter Turner Jul 17 '09 at 18:56
So do I which is why I asked it on ServerFault first! It was my own PC that was causing the problem, so I can see why SuperUser might be seen as more appropriate. – ChrisF Jul 17 '09 at 19:00
Even though SU is not public yet, cool – juan Jul 17 '09 at 19:32
installing IIS on Windows XP does not equal sysadmin work.. that's either a developer or superuser question. – Jeff Atwood Jul 22 '09 at 5:20
@Jeff - SuperUser wasn't open when I had the initial problem, so I thought I'd ask the question on ServerFault anyway just in case. – ChrisF Jul 22 '09 at 8:22

What do you expect? One website is for a rather specific niche that can sometimes easily fall under SO's umbrella (or now, SuperUser's), while the other is a free-for-all melee where anything related to a computer goes. It's only natural that SuperUser is more popular, I wouldn't be surprised if it ends up being the most popular of the trilogy, to be honest.

share|improve this answer
I'd think I'd be more apt to have a real question about a topic relevant on ServerFault, than on SuperUser (especially if I wanted a real answer) and I'm a programmer, not a sysadmin. I kind of think ServerFault will have lasting usefulness whereas SuperUser may be a flash in the pan sort of experience – Peter Turner Jul 17 '09 at 18:53

SuperUser is amazing than any others in the SO Quadrilogy. It is growing faster than others definitely.

share|improve this answer

It could be that ServerFault is also suffering a little from its' own image. There may very well be people that can answer SF questions, but do not even go there because they perceive themselves as not being 'expert' enough to belong on a SysAdmin site.

Pure speculation of course, but I wouldn't be surprised.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .