Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

There are 5 close reasons in MSO:

  • exact duplicate,
  • off-topic
  • subjective and argumentative
  • too localized
  • noise or pointless

but the noise or pointless reason does not exist on meta SE 2.0 sites, and "not a real question" is still there:

  • exact duplicate,
  • off-topic
  • subjective and argumentative
  • not a real question
  • too localized

Should the close reasons on meta SE 2.0 sites align with those of MSO?



share|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

In the name of consolidation and simplifying the existing standard close reasons, we're changing "subjective and argumentative" to

not constructive

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion.

The meta "noise or pointless" will be decommissioned and folded into this one. That is, if something was closed as NoP it will (soon) be retroactively closed as "not constructive".

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .