Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 153 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Currently SO contains 57 56 0 posts tagged . Out of these, most refer to the SOLID principles introduced by Uncle Bob Martin. The following two, however, seems to refer to solid bodies instead:

So I thought the tag should be split into and , and the original tag blacklisted.

Please post/comment if you have any issues or improvement suggestions. And of course, feel free to vote up or down to show your (dis)agreement :-)

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by psubsee2003, Shadow Wizard, rene, Martijn Pieters, mmyers Jul 14 '14 at 15:16

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – psubsee2003, Shadow Wizard, rene, Martijn Pieters, mmyers
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Maybe solid-oop instead of principles? Don't know, just an idea – Pëkka Oct 13 '10 at 10:13
@Pekka, Not a bad idea, although IMHO it should be OOD rather than OOP. So how about [solid-ood-principles]? – Péter Török Oct 13 '10 at 13:59
@Péter that would be accurate but too long IMO. Would OOP as the "top category" not work here? (I can be totally wrong with this categorization, I'm not an expert in OOD theory.) The disambiguation should be as short and as clear as possible, like Wikipedia's "Blue_(Colour)", "Blue_(Magazine)", and "Blue_(Movie)". – Pëkka Oct 13 '10 at 14:09
@Pekka, I don't really see a general consensus or pattern of following the Wikipedia convention in naming SO tags, but I may easily be ignorant - any feedback from the more knowledgeable would be appreciated. – Péter Török Oct 13 '10 at 16:01
+1 for the find; not sure what to do about it yet, though. – Jon Seigel Oct 13 '10 at 16:44
@Pekka, in the end I decided to implement my original idea; see my explanation in the body of the post. Thanks for your contribution though, it helped clarifying my thoughts :-) – Péter Török Oct 17 '10 at 14:20
You should post the update as an answer, though blacklisting [solid] might still be needed. – Gnome Oct 17 '10 at 14:29
@Peter yeah! Looks perfectly fine, good job. – Pëkka Oct 17 '10 at 18:47
@Roger, done, thanks. – Péter Török Oct 18 '10 at 8:00
@Moderators, shall I leave the answer unaccepted until the blacklisting is done? What is the preferred way of dealing with this? – Péter Török Oct 18 '10 at 8:03

After a few days' of letting my thoughts settle, I decided to implement my original idea of splitting the tag into and . Although Pekka suggested an alternative, in the end I felt that is the simplest and most expressive tag in this case. (The term "SOLID principles" is clearly related to OO, and AFAIK there are no known principles marked with the same acronym but relating to other programming paradigms, so I felt no need for classification.)

I have done the retagging today, in the hope that this helps making SO a tad cleaner, nicer and less ambiguous place :-)

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .