Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

In an ideal world, if the guys in Bridge starred this message, it should be the original message that actually gets starred.

share|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

The "ideal world" -- yeah, I've heard of that.

Your point is good, though, and I agree with it. Most of the time, at least. I can imagine edge cases where starring a quote would not warrant starring the original, but in most cases, you're probably right.

As you would've guessed, this is non-trivial to implement. If the quote-starrer has already starred the original, should this result in "no change"? Or should it mean a star just for the quote? Or should this justify a "double star" for the original?

Never mind the cross-site case (as in your example), where the "who starred what" question gets even more complicated.

But yes, this is worth considering.

share|improve this answer
Although it should be noted that nobody has actually starred your quote so far :) – balpha Nov 7 '10 at 22:34
"If the quote-starrer has already starred the original, should this result in no change?" Or the quoted post should just show up as starred already to anyone who starred the original post – Michael Mrozek Nov 8 '10 at 0:31
Simply displaying the original post body in the sidebar instead of the permalink would be an improvement, possibly with a leading > quote marker, surely this can't be too much work? (famous last words) – David X. Random Feb 22 '13 at 9:22

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .