What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 134 Stack Exchange communities.

The other day I came across this answer.

The accepted answer only provided a link, but the link was not working anymore. So for me, the answer was not helpful at all. This was even the accepted answer.

I did a quick downvote, was this a moral thing to do, or should I have left it as is?

share|improve this question
19  
This is exactly why it's a good practice to include a summary when you post a link. Answers with nothing but a dead link are pretty useless. –  mmyers Dec 1 '10 at 17:05
2  
Upvoting/downvoting is mostly a matter of personal opinion: an upvote means "I like this answer", while a downvote means "I dislike this answer". Still, it's a good practice to suggest improvements to questions that need further clarification. –  Anderson Green Aug 23 '13 at 15:47
    
An answer with a dead link is not useful, which meets the criteria "This answer is not useful". –  Johannes Kuhn Dec 19 '13 at 11:58

2 Answers 2

up vote 25 down vote accepted

No, assuming the link-only answer was any good to begin with, then it deserves an edit to fix the link. If you can't edit the post, add a comment to draw the author's attention to the post, and a flag for moderator deletion if that doesn't work.

share|improve this answer
6  
And/or a comment to draw the problem to the attention of the user who supplied the answer. –  Lawrence Dol Dec 1 '10 at 18:38
3  
-1. Also downvote. –  AAA Nov 6 '13 at 22:38

Joel is right that you should always try to fix/improve/edit problem content first. However, if that's not possible for whatever reason, absolutely go ahead and downvote. While you're at it, raise a flag, too. Link-only answers are prime candidates for rapid mod deletion even when the links aren't dead. (Do give a full explanation of what's going on, though, so that the mod who handles your flag doesn't convert the post into an equally useless comment.)

More to your point, having a high-scoring post that contains little or no useful information doesn't help anyone, and it makes the community seem... let's just say "less than trustworthy." Perhaps the downvote will even get the attention of the OP and lead to an edit.

share|improve this answer
5  
A downvote usually works better than a comment to get the author's attention... optimal choice would be comment+downvote, otherwise you get these guys who are all like "Would the downvoter plz comment?!" and don't bother to fix their crappy link-only answer. –  Wesley Murch May 25 '12 at 17:15
    
Yeah, definitely, @WesleyMurch. I thought about saying that explicitly, but I figured my answer was long enough, and Joel already covered it. –  Pops May 25 '12 at 17:20

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .