Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Currently, there are 25 questions on SO that have as one of their tags. A sample of some of these questions' titles are as follows:

It seems like the only way that these questions are related to one another is by chance -- it's not inherently descriptive at all. Could we get rid of this (arguably useless) tag? Does it add any value that I'm not aware of?

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Martijn Pieters, random, Monica Cellio, CRABOLO, Shadow Wizard Jul 18 '14 at 21:50

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – Martijn Pieters, random, Monica Cellio, CRABOLO, Shadow Wizard
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

@KennyTM Didn't even realize you could do "[tag:..." – Donut Dec 15 '10 at 19:25
It's a relatively new feature that was implemented a couple weeks ago. You can read up more about it here, Donut. ♪ – Grace Note Dec 15 '10 at 20:34
up vote 4 down vote accepted

This happens when people don't realize tags can't contain spaces; for example, was almost certainly tagged "without curl", which turns into -- the author meant to tag it something like . I think the policy in the past has been to blacklist words like "without" that only come up in these situations

share|improve this answer
Gotcha... so who does the "blacklisting"? And do you agree that this is an appropriate case for doing so? – Donut Dec 15 '10 at 20:06
@Donut A developer needs to do it. This probably is a good case for it; they'll see your post and comment I imagine – Michael Mrozek Dec 15 '10 at 20:22
Gotcha. Sounds good. – Donut Dec 15 '10 at 21:03
Actually, I think what happens now is that they've raised the bar for creating new tags, such that all we have to do to blacklist it for about 95% of all users is remove all uses of the tag. Then it will be deleted (iirc at midnight utc) and de facto blacklisted. – Joel Coehoorn Dec 15 '10 at 22:58

Agreed, it is now burninated.

tag burninated

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .