Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 153 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I hovered over the number, and it took me a few moments to realize what the tooltip was saying (still not sure I really understand it). The wording could be better. I believe it was saying:

You answered x questions in this tag, and received total rep of y from those answers.

alt text

The non-wiki thing would be indecipherable to a newcomer. There's a lot of moving parts in the sentences. Score is ambiguous; is that upvotes or reputation? Hard to believe I've averaged less than two rep on each answer in the C# tag.

share|improve this question
    
IMO, the only thing unclear is the total score thing. That being said, I agree it might be confusing to a new user. – Jon Seigel Dec 16 '10 at 23:19
    
@Jon: It's confusing to me, and I've been here awhile. But maybe I'm just dense. – Robert Harvey Dec 16 '10 at 23:20

The question number should be separated out and set before the answer number, then the tool-tips can be separate.

share|improve this answer

I am open to rephrasing this but there are a few fairly tricky rules in play.

Community Wiki answers are totally ignored when we assign out tag badges, additionally, tag badges are assigned based on score - that is - number of upvotes minus number of downvotes.

So, the scores we show on the user page, reflect those rules. That way you can tell you are one upvote away from a coveted bronze badge.

I don't really want to change any rules, but am totally open to a better phrasing for this sentence.

share|improve this answer
    
How about You answered x questions in this tag, and received y qualified upvotes from those answers. I'd be OK with the term "qualified" being described elsewhere. But "score" can mean anything. – Robert Harvey Dec 16 '10 at 23:32
    
For the questions, x questions you asked in this tag received y qualified upvotes. – Robert Harvey Dec 16 '10 at 23:37
2  
then meta will be flooded with "what is a qualified upvote" :) – waffles Dec 16 '10 at 23:39
    
The biggest problem I have is with the word "score." I think if you replaced that with "net upvotes" it would be good enough. – Robert Harvey Dec 17 '10 at 0:00
    
"Score" is used in other places on the site and is pretty much accepted terminology; I'm not a big fan of making a new "qualified upvote" term just for this one tooltip – Michael Mrozek Dec 17 '10 at 0:01
    
@Michael: Is "score" actually defined anywhere? It's not in the glossary – Robert Harvey Dec 17 '10 at 0:02
    
@Robert, surely you can add it :) – waffles Dec 17 '10 at 0:05
    
@waffles: I'm not convinced that "score" is a commonly-used, well-known term in the SE universe. Is it? – Robert Harvey Dec 17 '10 at 0:06
    
@Robert I don't know if it's "officially defined", but it's used to refer to the sum of up and downvotes anywhere that value is important (the tag "top users" pages come to mind) – Michael Mrozek Dec 17 '10 at 0:19
    
@waffles: I added "score" to the glossary, and clarified the faq question describing all of the badges. – Robert Harvey Dec 17 '10 at 0:28

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .