What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 131 Stack Exchange communities.

This question already has an answer here:

Would it be a good idea to also reward users with rep points when they unlock a new golden badge?

Access to 100% of the moderation tools only happens at 10k points. Scoring that amount of rep is hard and takes time, reflecting the commitment of a user toward the community.

As many of you are aware, the FAQ states that access to the previous level of moderation is achieved at 3k points, and going from 3k to 10k is a really LONG LONG way.

Since golden badges also represent a higher commitment to the community and can be very difficult to get, I wonder if we should also reward a user with rep points (300? 400? 500?) to help him on his journey.

What do you think?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Jim, Martijn Pieters, Hugo Dozois, hims056, Undo Sep 13 '13 at 2:04

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

1  
-1 Why? Bad formulated question? I'm not sure its OK to down vote just because you don't agree with my suggestion. –  karlphillip Dec 22 '10 at 2:00
10  
@karlphilip but that is how Meta works. Disagreement = downvote. It's not like on SO proper –  Pëkka Dec 22 '10 at 2:14
    
@Pekka Just upvote some answer you agree with. No harm done. –  karlphillip Dec 22 '10 at 2:24
8  
@karlphillip: Try not to conflate downvoting with malice ("harm"). It is useful to treat rep as a semi-random integer, given to you by a stranger. Downvotes on meta don't mean "I don't like you"; they could mean "this is not a good idea". –  Piskvor Dec 22 '10 at 10:09
    
@Gamecat It's not since I'm not suggesting awarding points along with each badge. –  karlphillip Dec 24 '10 at 21:06

3 Answers 3

up vote 2 down vote accepted

It's a heck of a lot easier to amass 10k rep than get most of the gold badges (and of those that can be got before, they're difficult and time-consuming). Just make helpful and thoughtful answers and you'll climb the mountain; the accelerated route is to compete for bounties. There's no need to make badges give out “monetary” awards.

That said, if there's points being given out for gold badges, there should be something for the lower badge levels too (e.g., so that there's 1 rep for bronze, 10 for silver, 50 for gold) to form a full system. Like that it would give a small boost but won't distort the requirement for experience at the lower levels before granting access to the advanced capabilities.

share|improve this answer

They already get a golden badge as a reward for whatever they did. I don't think there needs to be an additional reward for receiving a reward.

share|improve this answer
13  
☢ "This reward was brought to you from the department of redundancy rewardments." –  mario Dec 22 '10 at 3:00

I agree, but would it be fair to reward the user with only 500 points? It doesn't seem much, especially since - like you said - gold badges are very difficult to get.

Maybe along with the 500 rep reward, the user could be awarded an additional gold badge too.

share|improve this answer
5  
Huh? So award a gold badge for earning a gold badge? –  animuson Sep 12 '13 at 18:12

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .