Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

6 hours until the cap reset and I've already run out of votes to grant for the day. This is unfortunate for people providing good questions or answers, but wholly understandable.

As I understand it, the stackoverflow 'day' resets for everyone at the same time, correct? (8pm Eastern Time?)

If this is the case, and if a majority of active users are hitting the daily vote cap, then people asking good questions and providing good answers near the end of the day are less likely to get votes than those just after the day resets. If the 'day' reset for different people at different times, distributed around the clock, then this problem could be avoided.

It would be very interesting if someone with deep access to the data ran a query to validate or refute the existence of this problem.

Edit: I've just discovered; I'll see if I am able to create a query to find out this information or not and report back either way.


OK, apparently there is not much of a problem here (or, as the downvote indicated: "this idea sux!!1!"). I've created two queries to track average question score by hour and average answer score by hour. I've graphed the results of both:

Graph of Posts and Answer Scores by Hour

Although perceived quality of questions and answers dips around +0900 UTC, there is not (as I had feared) a strong downward slope towards the end of the day resetting at +0000 UTC.

It was fun to play with, though. :)

share|improve this question
SO time is UTC, so it's 7pm ET in winter. – balpha Dec 31 '10 at 19:09
Please, if you're going to downvote the suggestion, supply an argument as to why you disagree. Drive-by-downvoting helps no one. – Phrogz Dec 31 '10 at 19:16
On Meta a downvote can often mean, "Ur idea sux lol!!!11!" – random Dec 31 '10 at 19:18
An upvote can also mean "I like you." – bobobobo Dec 31 '10 at 19:50
@Phrogz: drive-by downvoting helps everyone. Aggregate votes appear on the main page; comments do not. – Shog9 Dec 31 '10 at 20:42
@Shog9: No, it helps nobody. But if someone's made a comment that gives the reason why I downvoted, I'll upvote that comment. (If there isn't such a comment, I'll make the comment myself. Or it will be utterly blisteringly obvious what's wrong with the question, such as a total lack of vowels or other such stupidity. ;-)) – Donal Fellows Dec 31 '10 at 21:56
@Shog9 OK, I suppose I agree. Votes are useful to the population as a whole whether or not they are explained. I should have said "Drive-by-downvoting doesn't help me understand what is wrong with my suggestion, nor provide any seed for further discussion of the topic by others." – Phrogz Jan 1 '11 at 2:05
@Phrogz: that's the right attitude. If someone down-votes you (or up-votes you...) without leaving a comment, just think to yourself, "Well, they don't want to discuss it" and move on. – Shog9 Jan 1 '11 at 19:40

I'm really not sure I see what the issue is here.

I vote a lot. Well, I don't know that I vote more than others, but I know I use up all moy votes quite frequently. I'm in EST, so sometimes I'll be using the site around 7/8 PM, and will get 30 more votes after already using mine up. I often will wait for my next day's votes to become available so I can keep voting.

But this inevitably has a consequence: I then can't vote as much the next day.

So regardless of if your votes reset for you during a "day" in your timezone or not, you still get 30 votes per 24 hour period. What does it matter where the 24 hour period starts and stops?

Also, I'm not sure how but I have a good feeling that you could abuse or game the system if your votes were dependent on your timezone. If nothing else it would be a lot more to code with no apparent benefit. Maybe I'm missing something, I just don't see it.

share|improve this answer
(And if I am missing something, I'm sure a freehand circle would show me where it was...) – The Unhandled Exception Jan 1 '11 at 19:30
We need a Meme way over used vote for comments. – Rebecca Chernoff Jan 1 '11 at 19:36
...Meme way overused flag for comments... Also, oy. – Shog9 Jan 1 '11 at 19:41
I don't understand @Rebecca. How can a meme be overused..? Isn't that was a meme is by definition? ;-) – The Unhandled Exception Jan 1 '11 at 20:03
Imagine if every user was on stackoverflow around 0:00UTC, waiting for the day to reset so that they could vote like a maniac. Imagine that each user used up all their votes in the first hour. This would mean that no votes would be placed on the site between 01:00UTC and 23:59UTC; there would be a strong disincentive to ask new questions or post new answers during that time. This (to a lesser extent) is the problem I was concerned existed. I'm not 100% sure that my queries prove that there isn't any such effect, but I'm no longer concerned that it makes much of a difference. – Phrogz Jan 1 '11 at 22:11
But questions asked during that time will be upvoted when people get their votes back... There's no time limit for upvoting... – The Unhandled Exception Jan 3 '11 at 14:02
@TheRenamedException This becomes increasingly less likely as traffic on the site increases and questions quickly become 'old', seen only on page 2 or 10 or whatever of any general list being displayed. – Phrogz Feb 6 '11 at 15:46

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .