Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Possible Duplicate:
What purpose does downvoting questions serve?

I've been using SO for a while now, and I've noticed that some questions get voted down without people saying why they vote down.

My understanding for when one should vote down, is:

  • The question is offtopic (probably the most common closing reason)
  • The question lacks information
  • The question is subjective and argumentative

Besides these reasons, there seems to be a hundred other reasons why people see the urge to vote down.
The question is, why would someone vote down a question, probably wanting to make future questions better, and not comment on it?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Shog9, Rosinante, ChrisF, waiwai933, Aarobot Jan 2 '11 at 20:55

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

2  
An important distinction, were any voted down on MSO? The ecosystem here is a bit different. – jcolebrand Jan 2 '11 at 6:06
    
"In which case commenting on it would still help" and yet they disagree. You can't use technology to force a social change. Sadly. – jcolebrand Jan 2 '11 at 6:31
    
Please edit your question to include links to the posts that were downvoted -- we may be able to give you more direct guidance than simply answering the question posed here. – Jon Seigel Jan 2 '11 at 6:40
    
@Jon Seigel: Actually, I didn't want to include any links, to keep the question objective... – user153773 Jan 2 '11 at 6:57
    
Well, downvotes (and voting in general) is inherently subjective. I understand abstracting the question here (although we could surely say this topic has been covered on Meta before), but I think you'd get better feedback by citing specific examples. – Jon Seigel Jan 2 '11 at 7:13
    
@Jon Seigel: Indeed this topic existed before on MSO, but I guess bringing it on just once again doesn't hurt... – user153773 Jan 2 '11 at 8:26
2  
See: What purpose does downvoting questions serve? and Why is down-voting a question important? - and FWIW, I don't down-vote to make future questions better, I down-vote to let other readers know that the post I'm voting on is a waste of their time. – Shog9 Jan 2 '11 at 19:59
1  
@nebukadnezzar: -1 You wrote Indeed this topic existed before on MSO, but I guess bringing it on just once again doesn't hurt – user150068 Jan 2 '11 at 21:02
    
@Alejandro True. But it got closed anyway. – user153773 Jan 2 '11 at 21:16

There is no requirement to explain a vote.

Period.

Every day, hundreds of truly awful questions arrive on the sites. Some people take the time to downvote them. A very few takewaste the additional time to explain. It's not like it's genetic engineering to tell what makes a good or bad question. Just reading the FAQ and paying some tiny bit of attention to it will pretty nearly guarantee you a positive vote count.

While there are, of course, some drive-by downvotes of innocent questions, there are far more 'pity upvoters' of downvoted questions, however awful. So you really have to work hard to make a question so poor that it ends with a net negative tally.

share|improve this answer
    
I forgot to add that I was talking about quite wellformed questions, questions where you can see that the author took the time to write a good question. It's just my opinion, and I always add a comment when I don't agree with a question or an answer. – user153773 Jan 2 '11 at 20:12
    
@nebukadnezzar: so, uh... why are you down-voting good questions? – Shog9 Jan 2 '11 at 20:14
    
@Shog9 What are you talking about? – user153773 Jan 2 '11 at 20:17
    
@nebukadnezzar: you wrote that you were talking about good questions, and that you always add a comment when you down-vote. But by limiting the scope to questions you already like, you're implying that you down-vote questions you don't think are bad. – Shog9 Jan 2 '11 at 20:27
    
@Shog9 I rarely vote down or up, how does this relate to anything? I don't browse SO daily either, so I can hardly decide when a question is 'good' or 'bad' - asking in general is a good thing, IMHO. – user153773 Jan 2 '11 at 20:33
    
@neb: so then what was the point of your first comment on this answer? – Shog9 Jan 2 '11 at 20:35
    
@Shog9 It seemed like @Rosinante was referering to MSO, instead of SO. And I can understand that some questions on MSO tend to be not exactly perfect - it was merely a misunderstanding from my side. – user153773 Jan 2 '11 at 20:37
    
@nebukadnezzar I think Rosinante was indeed referring to SO proper, not Meta. – Pëkka Jan 2 '11 at 20:44
    
@Pekka so it was nothing but a misunderstanding. :-) – user153773 Jan 2 '11 at 20:50
2  
@nebukadnezzar yeah. And I wholeheartedly agree - there simply is too much bad content coming in for there to be time to leave a comment, especially if there is strong indication that it's going to be useless anyway because the OP doesn't want to learn anything. – Pëkka Jan 2 '11 at 20:52
    
@Pekka I see. But I can assure you that I don't ignore comments I receive - but as you said, this seems to count only for a minority of people. – user153773 Jan 2 '11 at 20:57
1  
@neb it's SO I'm talking about. As always around here, if you can't link to it, it never happened. If you have a population of good questions that ended up negative, post links. – Rosinante Jan 2 '11 at 21:26
    
@Rosinante See my comments to the original question. The linked question doesn't include links either, and I'm not going to add any. – user153773 Jan 2 '11 at 21:41
    
@nebu: your inability to add to what's already been discussed here is why this was closed as a duplicate. – Shog9 Jan 2 '11 at 23:09
3  
@neb mene mene tekel upharsin. – Rosinante Jan 3 '11 at 0:33

An important distinction, were any voted down on MSO? The ecosystem here is a bit different. – drachenstern

drachenstern already said this, but I thought it was important enough to get an answer:

On MetaStackOverflow, sometimes all a downvotes means is "I don't aggree", "I don't think this is a good idea", or even "I don't like you". Conversely, sometimes (On MSO) all an upvote means is "I aggree", "I do think this is a good idea", or even(yes, even this) "I like you".

share|improve this answer
    
"I don't like you" and "I like you" seem to be fairly common reasons on SO ;-). Not saying how this affects downvotes or upvotes, but I figure you can imagine what I mean. – user153773 Jan 2 '11 at 20:14
1  
@neb: Those are not valid or common reasons anywhere. On Stack Overflow an up/downvote means "this is [not] useful/correct". On Meta it means "I agree/disagree". I seriously doubt "I don't like you" is anywhere near as common as you seem to believe. – Aarobot Jan 2 '11 at 20:51
    
@Aarobot On a second thought, I'll have to agree - I meant to say it's one of many reasons - Sorry for implying. – user153773 Jan 2 '11 at 20:56

There's a lot of petty retaliation here, too. If someone dislikes an answer, they'll go and vote everything a user did down. Sometimes it has nothing to do with a question.

share|improve this answer
2  
The fact that this got voted -2 is a clear indication of "petty retaliation" – thrillscience Jan 2 '11 at 20:07
1  
@Thrillsciense I've got to agree with you here - I see no reason either to vote down here. – user153773 Jan 2 '11 at 20:14
8  
Petty retaliation? You accuse the entire userbase of vote-abuse, with no proof and in ignorance of the systems and policies in place to restrict such behavior, and the only reason you can think of for being down-voted is that folks hate you for something else you wrote? – Shog9 Jan 2 '11 at 20:34
    
You really need to define "a lot." Yes, it happens, but compared to legitimate downvoting of bad questions we get very few reports of retaliatory downvoting. – Bill the Lizard Jan 2 '11 at 20:43
1  
@Shog9 I doubt he meant the whole userbase. – user153773 Jan 2 '11 at 20:51
6  
I'm sure there's a little bit of petty retaliation. There are also a lot of terrible answers. This is one of them. – Aarobot Jan 2 '11 at 20:53
4  
@thrillscience maybe you want to back your claim up with some actual data. – Pëkka Jan 2 '11 at 20:54
3  
@neb: fair enough - he only fingered every user who has ever disliked an answer posted by another user. – Shog9 Jan 2 '11 at 20:55
1  
@thrillscience: Well, you would know about petty retaliation. You did exactly that with me, after I asked you to clarify what "does not work" meant (not that -40 points matters to me). But that's the only time it happened to me, so your claim that there is "a lot" seems doubtful. – Lennart Regebro Jan 2 '11 at 22:02
    
@Lennart don't worry, those upvotes will be cancelled within 24 hours by the anomaly detection system. If they don't, E-Mail team@stackoverflow.com – Pëkka Jan 3 '11 at 0:23
    
@Pekka: Nice to know. (Although as mentioned 40 point here or there is rather irrelevant). – Lennart Regebro Jan 3 '11 at 8:54