Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

We maybe still need , but I'm asking if we need that tag on the new questions. E. g. it would be ok for Abstracting functions / avoiding repetition in functions to have (or maybe better ?) and optionally , because refers to the language from which Racket has grown – With the release of version 5.0, PLT Scheme was renamed to Racket.

UPDATE: We now have the tags synonyms "plt-scheme" and "drscheme". Thank you, thank you, people, thank you. I'm glad you helped us with votes. Thank you very much. :-)

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by CRABOLO, Shadow Wizard, gnat, nicael, ɥʇǝS Dec 2 '14 at 19:35

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question pertains only to a specific site in the Stack Exchange Network. Questions on Meta Stack Exchange should pertain to our network or software that drives it as a whole, within the guidelines defined in the help center. You should ask this question on the meta site where your concern originated." – CRABOLO, Shadow Wizard, gnat, nicael, ɥʇǝS
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

I remember there was a discussion about this before, but a whole bunch of retag requests got deleted... I really wish we could search deleted questions. Let me see if I can find it by date. – Jon Seigel Jan 6 '11 at 6:22
Well, I'm sure it's in there somewhere, but it's eluding me. – Jon Seigel Jan 6 '11 at 6:32
@Jon Seigel :-D – Yasir Arsanukaev Jan 6 '11 at 6:47
up vote 3 down vote accepted

We don't actually need anymore, because Racket is backward compatible with PLT Scheme, and most users have already updated their environments.

We don't need , we are happy with .

share|improve this answer
I asked at some point for all plt-scheme tags to be replaced by racket, and since there was no reply to that, I just went ahead and manually did the replacement on all questions that I found. There is no need for plt-scheme, even for questions that ask about past versions, since it's all known as "Racket" now -- and "PLT Scheme" should at best be considered as a name that was used for Racket in the past. – Eli Barzilay Feb 3 '11 at 14:22
@Eli: Thanks for your reply. I suggested the tag-synonym plt-scheme. If you think this is reasonable idea, and you're able to note the people about the tag and the need for votes, then notify them. – Yasir Arsanukaev Feb 5 '11 at 13:24
@Eli: I've also created a tag synonym for "drscheme", as I saw a question, tagged "drscheme" a couple of weeks ago, which AFAIR didn't have the tag "scheme". – Yasir Arsanukaev Feb 5 '11 at 18:31
@Yasir: I'm not sure how the synonym system works -- in general, what you said in this answer is what should happen: uses of plt-scheme and drscheme should be considered as old tags that should now be replaced with racket. If that's what the synonyms that you created lead to then that's perfect. Is there anything else that I should do? – Eli Barzilay Feb 6 '11 at 23:32
@Eli: Please, read Create Tag Synonyms. And all you should do is just vote for the tag synonyms, I suggested, and make others know about the suggestions, so that they head there and vote :-) – Yasir Arsanukaev Feb 7 '11 at 0:35
Seems like it'll be difficult to find people who can actually do this... – Eli Barzilay Feb 8 '11 at 18:47
@Eli: 2 individuals already did. 2 more votes needed. I used Freenode ;-) – Yasir Arsanukaev Feb 8 '11 at 18:54
Yasir: Yeah, I'm one of the two, and we already asked on freenode which resulted in a second... There's a few racket people who are semi-active on SO, but they don't have enough points for upvoting. – Eli Barzilay Feb 8 '11 at 18:58
@Eli: I have an idea. I'm going to ask answerers at SO to vote. Have just made one such request here "Including and external file in Racket". ;-> – Yasir Arsanukaev Feb 8 '11 at 19:11
Yasir: Heh -- the two people that I've asked are Sam and Jon, neither have enough points... – Eli Barzilay Feb 8 '11 at 19:27

Yes, we still need , because users that haven't yet updated to Racket want their questions be distinguished from Racket, and they don't tag their questions and together simultaneously, because nine times of ten it's meaningless (they often do).

We need .

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .