What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 128 Stack Exchange communities.

There are users asking questions, deletes and re-asks them if he doesn't get an answer, and also deletes them as soon as he gets a satisfactory one.

Examples for solved questions he deleted (I called upon Chat.Meta to undelete so they may be active again):

Examples for deleted and re-posted questions from Google (I'm not searching through them all) in which he is being warned about re-posting questions:

Full Google listing

This guy needs some kind of permanent boot.

Update: The guy came back to ask another useless XML question, and delete all the undeleted content again (except for those parts that were protected in the meantime by upvotes) , despite numerous comments and links to this Meta question. He is clearly not interested in changing his behaviour.

share|improve this question
7  
There should be a new limit on SE: 'You may only delete one question per week.' This limit should replace the awful 'Wait ten minutes before marking this answer as accepted'-limit. –  rightfold Jan 9 '11 at 19:28
2  
I agree that it is unacceptable, but please do not lower yourself to his level and mind your language. –  Toon Krijthe Jan 9 '11 at 19:30
    
@Gamecat, wait I'll edit it. I just hate that limit >.< –  rightfold Jan 9 '11 at 19:31
    
@Gamecat I can accept criticism about my language, but what do you mean by me lowering myself to his level? Because of the call to undelete? (I didn't see anything wrong with that but I'm open to arguments) –  Pëkka Jan 9 '11 at 19:32
    
@Time never mind, I edited it –  Pëkka Jan 9 '11 at 19:33
    
@Pekka I think Gamecat was talking to me. :) –  rightfold Jan 9 '11 at 19:33
    
@Time ah, I overlooked that, all right :) In that case, I'm rolling back the edit I made to the question :D –  Pëkka Jan 9 '11 at 19:33
1  
@Pekka, I mean the language, you can perfectly make your point without using these words. I hate it when great people lower themself to cope with trollish behaviour. –  Toon Krijthe Jan 9 '11 at 19:35
    
@Gamecat I sometimes need to use foul language when something angers me :) But you're right of course. –  Pëkka Jan 9 '11 at 19:38
    
And I know, sometimes the actions of people can make you mad as hell. The hardest part is to keep yourself up to level. So sorry if I sounded a bit offensive, I just tried to help (which sometimes can go terribly wrong.) –  Toon Krijthe Jan 9 '11 at 19:39
    
@Gamecat @Pekka I can't live without foul language! I use it all the freaking time. :D –  rightfold Jan 9 '11 at 19:39
1  
@Pekka, we are both right. But foul language needs to be spoken (preferably loud). –  Toon Krijthe Jan 9 '11 at 19:40
    
@Gamecat re your 2nd last comment: No offense taken. I will use the occasional swear word, but I have no problem removing them or having them edited out. Re your last comment: fair point :) –  Pëkka Jan 9 '11 at 19:40
    
Thanks. English is not my native language, and sometimes the message send does not cover the meaning. But learning all day keeps you awake (sometimes all night). –  Toon Krijthe Jan 9 '11 at 19:42
3  
@Pekka: I have the same feeling. But you can take 3 days off, then start watching it again. ;) –  Bill the Lizard Jan 10 '11 at 0:39
show 8 more comments

1 Answer 1

up vote 14 down vote accepted

I think his/her account should be suspended for at least 3 days, and he/she should receive an email about what he/she has misdone.

If he/she continues, his/her delete-privilege should be dropped.


Yes, women can also be programmers.

share|improve this answer
6  
At least a serious warning. (And I want more undelete votes ;-) –  Toon Krijthe Jan 9 '11 at 19:52
    
his/her delete-privilege should be dropped — wondering if that is an option? –  Arjan Jan 15 '11 at 15:03
    
@Arjan sure, this prevents him from deleting his own questions. –  rightfold Jan 15 '11 at 17:28
1  
I meant: does the current system allow for that? I've only seen accounts fully suspended, not any partial privileges being taken away. –  Arjan Jan 15 '11 at 17:52
1  
@Arjan I'm not sure, but I think this is easy to implement. I don't think it's a bad idea to implement this anyway. –  rightfold Jan 15 '11 at 17:53
add comment

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .