Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Possible Duplicate:
Can the limit on simultaneous bounties be relaxed?

I think it is unreasonable to limit users to only one bounty at a time. Why is there an arbitrary limit of N=1?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Shog9 Apr 14 '11 at 1:10

This question was marked as an exact duplicate of an existing question.

If you want to know why, the answers are here - it basically boils down to both the fact that bounty access was vastly opened from the original system, and that it simply hasn't changed since that time. If you want to request that it be relaxed, you want to see here. – Grace Note Jan 13 '11 at 19:37
@Grace Thanks (those links point to the same place.) Definitely should be relaxed. – tim Jan 13 '11 at 19:51
Oh, sorry. The second one was supposed to be this one. Still by the same user, as it were. Clipboard must've haywired. – Grace Note Jan 13 '11 at 19:52
Thanks for the links – tim Jan 13 '11 at 20:03

Hmm. Jeff says:

Would require major schema changes, so unlikely.

Also, not fielding a lot of actual, real world "wow, if I could just have one more bounty!" requests, other than this.. rather hypothetical.. one.

Which contradicts his other answer in June, 2010

I'd rather make decisions based on data (actual user behavior) than predictions (the way I guess users might behave). If, after a month or so, it looks safe to increase that limit to 2 or maybe even 3, we can revisit it then.

It seems reasonable (At the very least) to give it a trial. There is no valid reason against it.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .