Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 153 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I was searching for some linux stuff today, and I came over linuxexchange.org.

It seems very much like it is trying to imitate a StackExchange site, but I couldn't find anything at all on the page that said it were related to SA in any way.

Are they trying to copy/fake the StackExchange concept? Is that even allowed? And do anybody here even know about it (I couldn't find a single question here at meta when searching for linuxexchange...)?

share|improve this question
    
On a related subject, there is an SE2 Linux site: Unix and Linux – Michael Mrozek Jan 15 '11 at 1:46
up vote 6 down vote accepted

Seems to be a StackExchange 1.0 Site.

 <meta name="generator" content="StackExchange 0.9 (20100413135304-37b86aed49ad)">
share|improve this answer
    
@Henrik P. Hessel: and what does that mean? If you for instance look at the "administrator" (linuxexchange.org/users/2/jeremy), he describes himself as the "Founder of LinuxExchange". I didn't thing StackExchange sites had founders...? – Nailuj Jan 14 '11 at 23:00
3  
Don't know if there's any information on SE 1.0 here on meta but there's a wikipedia entry on this topic en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack_Exchange_Network#StackExchange_1.0 – Henrik P. Hessel Jan 14 '11 at 23:03
3  
@Nailuj: Prior to SE 2.0, anybody could start their own Stack Exchange site. So yes, they had founders. In a sense, SE 2.0 sites have founders too; they're the ones who participate in the Area 51 definition and private beta phases. – Aarobot Jan 15 '11 at 1:31
    
@ClausJørgensen Stack Exchange wasn't free previously. – Sathya Jan 15 '11 at 6:02
    
Thanks all, that cleared things up a bit :-) I wasn't aware of the licenceable SE 1.0 model. I still find it a bit strange though, that I couldn't find a single reference to SE anywhere on the sit, such as the faq (other than the tiny note in the page source pointed out by Henrik P. Hessel). – Nailuj Jan 15 '11 at 9:11
    
If the SE 1.0 license allows for it, it does not have to be strange - it is similar to how blogs do not necessarily mention which blog engine they run on. – Jean Hominal Jan 15 '11 at 10:56

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .