What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 128 Stack Exchange communities.

I realize that the tag renaming functionality has existed in its present form for quite some time and, as far as I know, no one has a problem using it, but I wanted to throw this out there in case anyone else is a bit tripped up about the difference between renaming and merging tags.

The helper text reads:

If the Remove Tag exists, it will be merged into the Master Tag, and then deleted; the Master Tag will exist after the merge.

If the Remove Tag does not exist, the Master Tag will be renamed to the Remove Tag (which will exist after the merge).

My problem with this is that which tag exists after the merge/rename depends on whether or not the remove tag exists. To me, it makes much more sense to have the master tag always be the tag that remains after the operation is completed. If the master tag exists, the remove tag is merged in. If the master tag doesn't exist, the remove tag is renamed. In essence it becomes the same operation either way - the remove tag is replaced by the master tag whether or not the master tag exists.

Of course, it's possible that if the functionality is switched it would trip up everyone that's already used to the way it works now, but I have a sneaking suspicion that most people read the helper text carefully each and every time to make sure they don't nix the wrong tag.

share|improve this question
    
1) Yes, indeed. Tags were not exactly well thought out; and the first entries are often incorrect. If addition to the other googlies, we have tag wars 2) you may be interested in this [related issue ](meta.stackexchange.com/q/75155/153030) –  PerformanceDBA Jan 18 '11 at 7:18
1  
Yes, please! Especially as I've had to do a lot of it lately due to this still-unresolved feature request. –  Dori Jan 18 '11 at 10:39
    
Related request: suggesting that the two functions be separated. –  Grace Note Apr 19 '11 at 16:20
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 1 down vote accepted

This page always confused me ... I went ahead and simplified

new ui

Simple, there is old, there is new ... old will be gone, new will be created (if it does not exist).

share|improve this answer
    
If old does not exist, what is the point of the merge operation? Does the new tag get created with no attached posts? –  Kyle Cronin Apr 27 '11 at 2:24
    
@Kyle that would be cause I suck at explaining .. editing –  waffles Apr 27 '11 at 3:30
add comment

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .