Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Possible Duplicates:
Let me reward a good edit on my question/answer
Etiquette for thanking an editor

As English is not my first language, I make a lot of spelling, grammar and phrasing errors. Thankfully, some peoples are kind enough to edit my post to correct those mistakes. (yes, Dori, Grace note and aarobot (along others) I'm talking of you.)

There should be a way for the original author of a post to thanks those editor that correct ours text, rewarding them with at least one point or more, this duty is essential to the stack-exchange websites.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Yi Jiang, Michael Mrozek, squillman, waiwai933, Jon Seigel Jan 23 '11 at 17:36

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

Possible duplicate of Let me reward a good edit on my question/answer. In addition, if you just want to thank the person who edited your question, comment replies can reach editors too, so something along the lines of "@<name of editor> Thanks for the edit!" will do – Yi Jiang Jan 23 '11 at 3:43
@Yi Jiang and any other closer, The main point of my post was "A way to thanks". Reputation is accessory. I wasn't aware of that other post, but I think it's just a misdirection. the point is a "way for the original author of a post to thanks those editor that correct ours text", it could be reputation, it could be just an approval message, but just a "claps in the back" (this is a translation from "tappe dans le dos" I'm not sure about it) for the editor. Than duty is very important and should be rewarded by on way or the other. And I know a thanks is sometime valuable reward. – DavRob60 Jan 23 '11 at 4:23
@meta: "Thanks" doesn't really mean anything on a scale like this. Better just demonstrate gratitude by contributing back to the community. – Lightness Races in Orbit Jul 17 '11 at 20:17
up vote 11 down vote accepted

As Yi Jiang pointed out @username comments work on post editors, so if you want to thank an editor for a really great edit do it in a comment, e.g.:

@davesmith thanks for the edit, that cleared up the question considerably for me.

share|improve this answer
Agreed. For anyone reading Jeff's answer, see as an example the comments of… – VonC Jan 23 '11 at 8:21
Ok, we could say tanks as in a @username comment, but has it has been said by someone else, I would not did it that way because I did not want "clutter up the comments with such thanks".… – DavRob60 Jan 24 '11 at 13:53

I think this is an interesting concept. I'm not sure if this has been suggested before or not, but I like the idea. I know automatic rep for editing has been suggested, which I am against, but the idea of the OP awarding an editor is different. Yes, there are already badges out there rewarding the active post editors based on sheer number of edits but the OP giving a rep reward is not something we have. This might even be a more reliable way of thanking the editors instead of using badges which are more easily gamed. If an OP thinks that an edit is beneficial then they could award a small amount of rep for the edit.

Editors in general make the sites better. That is deserving of a rep reward to me.

share|improve this answer
Why you don't want rep given to editor? – Tshepang Jan 23 '11 at 9:52
I do, that's what I'm saying. – squillman Jan 23 '11 at 14:11
If the editors are here to gain rep then they are not here for the right reasons. This is a non-issue. – Lightness Races in Orbit Jul 17 '11 at 20:17

Actually I like the idea of being able to donate a small amount of rep to any other person, for any reason. Is there any reason why this could/should not be added as a feature? All you would need is a way to identify the target user, a field for the amount (perhaps constrained to be something small, e.g. 1-10 points) and perhaps a short text field for a reason that will be seen by the recipient, and which may be left blank. A "tip" if you will.

I see this as covering this particular case (thanking an editor) as well as any other niche cases where someone goes out of their way to help you.

share|improve this answer

You can thank them in a comment and for me 9/10 the editor has posted an answer so I give them an upvote.

If they didn't asnwer the question you can go on there profile and choose a question/answer by them to upvote.

share|improve this answer
-1 You shouldn't give them an upvote just for editing, judge the answer on its own merit. – Nifle Jan 23 '11 at 9:58
@Benny: This is absolutely the wrong thing to do. Don't just pick one of their answers/questions. Upvoting/downvoting is supposed to reflect the quality of the post, not the person. You may have unwittingly given support to a poor post when you did not intend to. – Lightness Races in Orbit Jul 17 '11 at 20:18

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .