Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I've posted links to things I've developed or worked on in some answers. I always qualify the answer by saying that it is a "shameless plug" and also that there are probably other alternative solutions. In general, I'm very careful to make it not look like the post is self-aggrandizing. I also only post a plug if I feel that it is an actual solution, and not for "fame and/or fortune". Sometimes I get downvotes without any explanation, but overall reaction has been positive.

Still, I'm wondering; are there any general guidelines to posting a solution where the poster may have a sort of "conflict of interest"?

share|improve this question
up vote 7 down vote accepted

See the 3rd-last paragraph titled "May I promote products or websites I am affiliated with here?" in the FAQ.

Also, search meta for "self-promotion" (which can be OK) and "astroturfing" (which is not OK).

share|improve this answer

Where there is a conflict of interest, I would suggest a full, clear and frank disclosure of both the conflict, and how you stand to gain from your recommendation. The qualifications you use are of value in contributing to this disclosure. I don't see any problem with recommending something as a actual solution where there is such conflict, so long as there is such disclosure.

I have not been in precisely your situation, but on the one answer I gave that recommended a particular commercial product, I was very careful to state that I had no connection with the product, except as a very satisfied customer.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .