Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

This question already has an answer here:

There was this Question on SO this morning (GMT Time). I made an edit (I don't have enough rep to do it without peer review) and the changes I commited were

  1. Change the Title
  2. Fix code Indent

After this happened, my changes were accepted, and I +1-ed the question and put it as a favorite.

Within 1 minute I got +2 reputation, I have done peer-review-ed editing at least twice before but nothing like that happened.

Is this a bug on the system or is it standard behaviour? Is there any link we can find the detailed behaviour of how the edit-system works? Do all edits (either peer-reviewed or not) give you some reputation ?

Thanks for your time. I hope question is inline with the rules.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by animuson Aug 27 '13 at 4:17

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

up vote 16 down vote accepted

This just got implemented:

FYI ... edit suggestions queue is now visible to all 10k rep users... they also get the link at the top of the page. Also... when an edit suggestion is approved... a 2 point rep bonus is given to the suggestor... daily cap and total 1000 rep cap for this applies

So nope, it's a feature not a bug!

share|improve this answer
Wouldn't this introduce more sock-puppeteers now ? It's relatively easy(-ier) to get 15 reputation that way now, without even having to do a question or an answer (hence not having to deal with downvoting). Is there a required rep level to do even peer-reviewed edits? – Muggen Feb 2 '11 at 9:03
@Muggen A (rather unfortunate, imho) effect of reputation for proposed edits is that edits now must be "substantial enough" to get into the queue. See a great post with a "youre" in it? You can't fix it. – badp Feb 2 '11 at 9:07
500 accepted edits, required to get 1000 rep, would mean you'd have to edit a post on nearly 1% of all the questions on Super User. Surely gaming would require more effort than it's worth – Ivo Flipse Feb 2 '11 at 9:24
@Bruno, nice edit. Note that the title text can also be added after the link, like [1]: "Title text here" (as opposed to the alt text, in ![enter image description here][1]). – Arjan Feb 2 '11 at 21:01
@Arjan I wasn't sure how to do that so I added the tag. Thanks for the hint :) – BrunoLM Feb 2 '11 at 21:03

You can get a maximum of +1000 rep from edit suggestions.

Each approved edit suggestion increases your reputation by +2.

(There are other rules, such as, a given user can only approve so many edits by another user in a day, etc, but these are the important ones.)

share|improve this answer
Why would you want to limit the rep. Someone who does 500+ edits surely has great interest in improving SE, so why limit the rewards? – Tshepang Feb 2 '11 at 10:22
You could always allow +2 rep for the first 500 edits, and then just allow further edits without any +rep gain. – Muggen Feb 2 '11 at 10:27
@Tshepang Well, by the time you get 1000 reps from edits you're about half way to being able to edit 'normally' anyway, so it's not really that important a restriction anyway. – Yi Jiang Feb 2 '11 at 10:33
@mug The limit only applies to +2 rep increments, not how how many edit suggestions you can make. – Tshepang Feb 2 '11 at 10:35
@yij I guess 2k editing should have honored with their 'normal' edits anyways. Why not? – Tshepang Feb 2 '11 at 10:36
@Jeff Atwood i asked a similar question and was wondering.. why don't we make it for normal edits too.. – Shekhar_Pro Mar 1 '11 at 16:48

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .