Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 155 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Possible Duplicate:
Should smilies be turned into images in questions and answers?

It just struck me that we need emoticons. So often I find myself typing ;) and then wondering how to format it so it looks right. In the edit box, it looks fine, and I guess the backstrophe has been perfected so it looks right. But still the basic emoticons would be nice. And can't we have something creative, StackOverflow-ish, instead of the standard ones that we see in forums? I really like the ones Skype uses. A few that we should have are :), ;),:/, :(, :O, plus a few others I probably missed.

Oh, and no emoticons in code blocks.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Bill the Lizard Feb 4 '11 at 16:14

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

3  
No please, they remember me the fishy free smileycons programs that I usually find on my relatives pc (when I have to fix them) – systempuntoout Feb 4 '11 at 16:10
    
No, you're not the first. – Bill the Lizard Feb 4 '11 at 16:14
    
Last stop before animated avatars. ☹ – Arjan Feb 4 '11 at 16:14
1  
You're not the first, and you won't be the last, but you'll get the same response: NO! – gnostradamus Feb 4 '11 at 16:15
2  
<insert rchern-backwards-smiley joke here> – Tyler Carter Feb 4 '11 at 16:15
4  
This is what I think about this question: ఠ_ఠ – Won't Feb 4 '11 at 16:26

No

The world is a better place when not riddled with misshapen circles meant to represent emotion. If you really really really need them just use the ASCII alternatives that you listed.

share|improve this answer
1  
That "No" is not really large enough. No, really... there is no font large enough. – Robert Cartaino Feb 4 '11 at 23:29

I suggest that we format :) as:

And we can use the same algorithm for many others, including but not limited to the ones you've listed. The possibilities are endless!

share|improve this answer
    
This applies to questions and answers only, of course. Comments are exempt. – mmyers Feb 4 '11 at 16:14
    
I don't understand. What are we formatting as what? – Tshepang Feb 4 '11 at 16:22
4  
@Tshepang: Naturally! – mmyers Feb 4 '11 at 16:32
    
@tshepang: whoosh (sorry, but it's true) – jcolebrand Feb 4 '11 at 16:55
    
Is this a humor post? – Tshepang Feb 4 '11 at 17:03
5  
@Tshepang: Yes. You can tell because it has an emoticon in it. – mmyers Feb 4 '11 at 17:06
3  
I must consume my humor-detection vitamins more consistently. – Tshepang Feb 4 '11 at 17:09

Should we limit emoticons to comments? Vote up or down accordingly, this answer is CW.

share|improve this answer
5  
We should limit emoticons to non-existent. – dmckee Feb 4 '11 at 21:48

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .