Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I set a bounty (50 pts) on someone else's question, as I found it quite interesting but there had only been one half-answer. I posted an answer, but felt someone else may have been able to put in more input.

After about 5-6 days or so, only one extra answer had been posted - and it wasn't as complete as mine. As no one else seemed interested and my answer was the highest voted, I 'awarded' the bounty back to myself. I've now read, this loses the bounty? I don't understand this policy - I wouldn't have been 'gaining' 50 rep - I would just have recovered it (and on the highest rated answer too).

Even if I had cheekily awarded the bounty back to myself unjustly, I don't see that this would do any harm. The community would have voted up the best answers and the asker would accept the best question... so anyone trying to abuse the system wouldn't gain anything.

At the very least, I feel like I should have been prompted that awarding the bounty to my answer would lose it.

share|improve this question

closed as too localized by mmyers Dec 30 '11 at 15:52

This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet. For help making this question more broadly applicable, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

This is no longer possible: see… – mmyers Dec 30 '11 at 15:52
up vote 4 down vote accepted

If you award a bounty to yourself you don't receive the bounty amount - this is to prevent people gaming the system.

If this was allowed then people could place a bounty on a question to generate more interest then post their own answer and award the bounty to themselves.

When assigning a bounty you are risking some of your reputation in order to get an answer. It generates more interest if there is an additional reward.

See the Bounty FAQ for how the system works

share|improve this answer
Thank, I'd read that question already though. I still don't understand what would be to gain by just getting your own bounty back on someone elses question? – Mikaveli Feb 7 '11 at 9:34
@Mikaveli: That you don't lose that reputation. Example: You want badly an answer to a question, so you're awarding a bounty of 500 rep to it. After much work somebody figures it out, posts the answer and hopes to get the 500 rep as reward. But since we're cheating, we'll create now our own answer "xyz is right, but also blablabla..." and award the bounty to ourselves. Voilà, we have an answer and didn't lose reputation. – Time Traveling Bobby Feb 7 '11 at 10:08
@Bobby: I'm not convinced - if I badly need an answer to a question - why would I find someone else's question to stick a bounty on? Also, even if it was my own question - if my answer is the highest rated, wouldn't I deserve the bounty? – Mikaveli Feb 7 '11 at 10:15
@Mikaveli: Of course you would deserve the bounty, if you've actually answered your own question. But the chance that somebody is trying to trick the system is way higher (like my example). So you don't get your own bounty. – Time Traveling Bobby Feb 7 '11 at 11:26
@Bobby: berry120's suggestion that the highest rated answer could be automatically awarded the bounty seems like a good approach. In my case, at least the up-voting of my answer recovered a decent percentage of the bounty I set. – Mikaveli Feb 7 '11 at 11:36
@Mikaveli: The highest voted answer does not necessarily answer the question. – Time Traveling Bobby Feb 7 '11 at 12:02
@Bobby: That's why accepting the answer is a different thing. From my understanding, on a normal bounty question that's automatically accepted you get half points for highest voted answer (+2) and the other half for a accepted answer - couldn't we just use that system? – Mikaveli Feb 7 '11 at 12:05

What you gain is the fact that your question has inevitably received a heck of a lot more attention than most over the period of time the bounty has been in place. Whether this produced any more good answers or not is kind of beside the point, if everyone could do this and not lose anything then we'd see every man and his dog with their question on the "featured" page for as long as they like without losing anything.

Only thing I can perhaps see is that if you don't manually award the bounty and you've got the highest answer, perhaps it should go back to you in the full amount (after all, I think that's fair if you genuinely have got the best answer to your own question.)

In terms of manually awarding bounties to yourself though, I think the system should stay as it is.

share|improve this answer
The point here, is that it isn't my question - so I don't gain anything by getting the question loads more attention. I've tried to promote someone else's question - and just happened to end up providing the best answer. Although I can see how this could be abused for your own question. – Mikaveli Feb 7 '11 at 10:07
Yes, but whether it's your question or someone else's the point is similar. By "your question" I was referring to one that you wished to receive more attention, not necessarily one that you'd written. If this is a question that's particularly useful to you, there's plenty to gain by making it a lot more popular for a while! – berry120 Feb 7 '11 at 10:43
Maybe so, but if my answer is the highest rated - why shouldn't it deserve the bounty? The community usually upvotes the first correct answer highest etc, so I'm not sure how it's open to abuse? – Mikaveli Feb 7 '11 at 11:06
If it's the highest rated and the bounty is automatically awarded as such then I agree, it makes sense for you to get the bounty back. Perhaps that's a corner case that could have its behaviour changed? – berry120 Feb 7 '11 at 11:32
I think that would be fair behaviour. – Mikaveli Feb 7 '11 at 11:34
I'm with you on this. I just lost over half my reputation due to putting a 50-point bounty on link. When I saw it was going to go unclaimed and unanswered, I did a source dive on ncurses and various terminal emulators myself. It's a complete and correct answer of a highly esoteric question, but I lose. Sigh! – nick black Jun 29 '12 at 11:02

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .