What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 149 Stack Exchange communities.

I think that those who answer (as in accepted answer) popular questions (as determined by question up-votes) should receive a proportional rep boost.

The basic value should remain the same, but perhaps a scheme such as

0-5 +15 rep
6-10 +20 rep
11-15 +25 rep
16-20 +30 rep
21 - 30 +35 rep
31+ +40 rep

share|improve this question
Why? chr chr chr –  Remou Feb 11 '11 at 0:19
I've noticed on smaller boards (like math.se or ubuntu) there are fairly popular threads (+8 or +10 on the question) where the answerer was given +1 or +2 upvotes, this gives a proportional boost in lieu of answer upvotes for accepted answers. –  crasic Feb 11 '11 at 0:22
-1 This is a bad idea, on so many levels. –  Borror0 Feb 11 '11 at 0:38
I'm pretty sure there are multiple proposals for exactly the opposite –  Michael Mrozek Feb 11 '11 at 0:47

2 Answers 2

I can see only negative effects from this.

It would discourage people from answering niche, hard questions that have received little attention. Also, what's popular often takes the form of a poll - something that doesn't need to be rewarded by even more reputation.

share|improve this answer
Reversal candidate! –  Trufa Feb 11 '11 at 12:26

Popular questions inherently give more reputation to answerers because more people read them.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .