What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 127 Stack Exchange communities.

With the new capability to vote to delete answers, 20k users now have another kind of content to vote to delete. However, we still are rate-limited to only 5 total delete votes we can cast per day (which seem to apply to both votes on questions and answers).

I understand the reasons for wanting to rate-limit deletion, but with a new class of content to vote on, shouldn't we at least give a few more daily votes to the 20k users? Maybe up this to 10 delete votes a day at the 20k level?

share|improve this question
add comment

3 Answers

up vote 14 down vote accepted

Taking out the trash is indeed wholesome; this is being implemented such that you get an extra delete-vote (up to a maximum of 30 per day) for every 1000 rep after getting access to the moderation tools (typically 10k - I can't remember if that varies on beta/SE sites, etc) - so someone with 22k on stackoverflow would get:

  • 5 votes by default
  • 12 extra votes due to rep
  • for an effective 17 delete votes per day
share|improve this answer
    
There must be a bug ... either in your description, or in the implementation, as I just voted 30 times until I got the "no more" message. See my latest experiment. –  Paŭlo Ebermann Sep 14 '11 at 18:56
    
@Paŭlo see meta.stackexchange.com/questions/106056/… –  Marc Gravell Sep 14 '11 at 20:39
add comment

There exists the alternative of rate limiting answer deletion votes separately of question deletion votes.

This appeals to me, but I'm having a hard time articulating why (aside from the part where I don't have to implement it, of course). I'll come back to this later if I can muster a coherent argument.

share|improve this answer
1  
This is perhaps due to the fact that closed questions become more hidden to users, where "me-too" and "thanks" answers appear to anyone who views a question. There could be more of a reason to delete non-answers than bad questions. They're certainly different content types that are otherwise subject to slightly different rules. –  Brad Larson Feb 11 '11 at 21:28
    
I don't think it's a bad idea; however, it would be inconsistent with all other rate limits (flags, upvotes/downvotes, etc.) That could get confusing. Then again, since we're talking about 20k users, they should probably be able to handle a little nuance like that. –  Aarobot Feb 11 '11 at 23:19
add comment

I don't see why the two numbers should correlate. If anything, because there are more people who can delete answers the number of votes you get should go down. Deletion should be a last resort option, and making it harder to delete a post ought to be the goal.

If you're out of votes and notice a question/answer that absolutely needs deleting, you can still flag it.

share|improve this answer
4  
Um... That goal is ridiculously easy to achieve - just remove all votes and flags, and deleting a post becomes exceedingly hard. I rather suspect the goal is to make it easy to get rid of noise while minimizing the deletion of useful content. –  Shog9 Feb 11 '11 at 20:39
    
-1. Agree with @Shog9. –  Adam Robinson Feb 11 '11 at 20:42
2  
I agree that deletion is the last option for content, but it is necessary sometimes to keep the site clean. It looks like the thinking is that giving high-reputation users the ability to vote to delete answers would offload some moderator tasks onto the community. Now that they're entrusting us with this additional responsibility, why reduce the effectiveness of it? –  Brad Larson Feb 11 '11 at 21:29
    
+1 - The more users there are that can delete, the fewer delete votes are needed per user (and there are certainly enough users capable of deleting questions on StackOverflow). How many people actually use up all of their 5 delete votes per day? –  Justin Mar 14 '11 at 2:58
add comment

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .