Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I have just rejected an otherwise good edit because one word, in my opinion, went too far -'half-way' was changed to 'half-baked' - a comment may have been just the thing, but what do others suggest?

EDIT: As an aside, can Accept / Reject ping-pong?

share|improve this question
3  
Accept and then edit yourself? – Gelatin Feb 12 '11 at 18:27
    
@Simon I did think of that, but it did not seem to be quite right, however, it is certainly an option. – Remou Feb 12 '11 at 18:30
    
Accept, then edit or reject and then edit... Either one is fair game. Personally, I'd make the choice based on which result would be more acceptable if I didn't follow up with an edit. At least he didn't change it to "half-assed"... – Shog9 Feb 12 '11 at 23:10
up vote 4 down vote accepted

If the edit has a single problem, but is otherwise a good edit, I will open a new window on the editing question, accept the edit, refresh the new window, and fix the single problem.

If the edit has a number of problems, or changes the technical content of the post, I reject the edit. If the post still needs editing, and I have time, I edit the post myself.

More than half of the tag wiki edits that I approve have to be further edited. Which is not a complaint, by the way. There are many tag wikis that are getting filled in with good content because someone (no matter their rep) cares enough to post a tag summary and description.

share|improve this answer

You now have the option of "Improve", which would address this issue.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .