What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 130 Stack Exchange communities.

I find it strange that there's a 5 second limit between Comment votes. I sometimes read a few comments, and decide on the good ones, and then when voting it's like "damn, now I must wait".

share|improve this question
4  
[Status-declined]: Allow more than 1 comment upvote in 5 seconds. –  ЯegDwight Feb 16 '11 at 11:43
1  
Just be glad the timer doesn't reset if you're too soon... –  John Apr 12 '11 at 16:26

3 Answers 3

up vote 5 down vote accepted

Completely agree. I typically read all the comments first and then vote up 2-3 that I find useful. (But have to wait 5 seconds between votes).

I am working to make myself vote after reading each comment. But even then it normally takes me 1-2 seconds to read a comment (most are one sentence), which still leaves me with a 5 second warning if I vote two comments up that are close to each other.

share|improve this answer

As I think, the idea behind having 5 seconds gap in comment voting is to ensure that you read a comment and vote it, then read the next comment and vote it. Invariably, you will atleast need 5 seconds to read one comment after the other.

The idea is to avoid people from simply voting on comments to gain some badges. So when user sees there needs to be 5 seconds gap, he is probably forced to wait for 5 seconds and inturn he might end up reading the comment as well... :)

In your case and to very much my case as well, I read all the comments at once and then go on the voting spree. So I like your point where you are bringing up this to the notice of SO developers.

share|improve this answer
    
Was there a badge back in 2011 for up voting comments? There isn't one today. –  TylerH Mar 6 at 18:22

On one hand you're right it might be irritating when you read them first.

But on the other hand, this is good protection against people who vote comments up without bothering to even read them. They will vote up the first, then give up when having to wait 5 seconds, or even better take that time to read the comment.

Bottom line, I would keep it like this and remember to vote up each comment after I read it, if it was good.

share|improve this answer
9  
You could change the limit to something like "no more than 3 comment votes in 15 seconds" –  Michael Mrozek Feb 16 '11 at 9:44
    
@Michael - But how would you avoid people who simply vote for sake of voting. Even if such people get 3 votes at a time, they are fine right? They can move on to next question now. :) –  Sachin Shanbhag Feb 16 '11 at 10:06
    
@Sachin There are people who "vote for the sake of voting"? ...why? I guess you could limit the number of comment votes per day similar to post upvotes, if it's really necessary –  Michael Mrozek Feb 16 '11 at 10:17
    
@michael, the number of comment votes is already limited so the point @sachin makes is already somewhat handled. –  jzd Feb 16 '11 at 11:48
    
@jzd Oh, cool. Apparently I don't comment enough –  Michael Mrozek Feb 16 '11 at 11:50
    
@Michael, yes I believe it is 30 just like normal votes. (I do vote on comments more and have run into the limit several times, but not normally before I run out of normal votes). –  jzd Feb 16 '11 at 11:52

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .