Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 157 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

I'm wondering if anyone has performed any statistics on correlation between highest-voted answers (regardless of time of post) and poster's current reputation.

Specifically, I'd like to somehow answer the question: Can statistics back up my gut feeling that high-rep users were "good" even without much "practice"?

Or, put another way, is reputation not only a good way of measuring the time and effort put into answering, but also one's "true skill" in the area in general?

share|improve this question
Sounds like an interesting correlation to research. I'm looking for pointers to the SO API for a similar query. – LarsH May 5 '11 at 15:00
If you get something like this written, e.g. using…, please post it. I'd like to use it as a template for checking other correlations. – LarsH May 12 '11 at 15:11

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .