What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 122 Stack Exchange communities.

I've noticed that if a user if off chat for some time, automatic completion for her username doesn't work. I've also learned that in such a case, the user won't be notified even if you manually enter their name. My question is, how long should user be off chat for such to happen?

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 7 down vote accepted

As far as I can tell, usernames are never forcibly removed from the auto-complete, so it works for as long as you have the room open. Therefore, you will always see the names of anyone who has been in the room while you were there until you leave and then re-enter the room in some form (via refresh, closing the browser, etc.).

Conversely, you won't see the names of people who left before you entered the room unless their messages are visible on your screen (the chat will populate the auto-complete with all names you have reason to know about). This does not mean that you can't notify them, however. If you manually enter their name, they will be notified via the StackExchange™ SuperCollider MegaDropdown™ if the chat notification criteria is met.

More generally, the appearance of a username in the auto-complete doesn't guarantee that you can notify that person, nor does the absence of a username imply that you can't.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for fetching @balpha in the Tavern, Tim. I guess things did radically change from last I knew it. ♪ –  Grace Note Feb 22 '11 at 18:08
    
@GraceNote Your ninja skills never fail to impress :) Chat is an ever-evolving work of art, it seems. –  Tim Stone Feb 22 '11 at 18:11
    
Well, who else would've thrown that star on your inquiry of which of us was right? ♪ You should make the revision about the left-before-enter part, though. –  Grace Note Feb 22 '11 at 18:11
    
@GraceNote It's always hard to tell with stars in that room. Edited appropriately, now. –  Tim Stone Feb 22 '11 at 18:14
add comment

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .