Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 153 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

As I understand it, the idea for Careers 2.0 is for it to be the place for your CV. No longer shall we have CV's here, there and everywhere - Careers 2.0 is where it's at!

If Careers 2.0 is really going to be definitive place to store your CV then I think the following fields need to be available:

  • Full Name
  • Full Address including post/zip code
  • Date of Birth
  • Marital status
  • Nationality
  • Telephone Numbers
  • Referee Details

All of these fields should, by default, only be visible to the logged in user so that they only appear on a printed copy of your CV.

If possible it would be quite nice to have these available on an online version of your CV. Maybe we set a secret key that we can provide with our public profile URL. If a secret key is entered they get to see your full personal details otherwise they see the current version as it is.

Suggestions?

share|improve this question
    
Why would you ever put your marital status on a CV? – mmyers Feb 25 '11 at 17:30
    
@mmyers - some people do. I have no idea why but they do. – codingbadger Feb 25 '11 at 17:33

I'm going to defer this. I like the idea of allowing more info on profiles (and different cultures have different customs when it comes to that). I also like the idea of being able to expose that selectively, although you'd have to be careful w/r/t implementation. We would need to add controls to the profile to allow you to determine what you want to show and what not. So, while I like the idea, I'm not convinced that the additional overhead is worth it.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for taking a look. If you feel the overhead is too great at present that deferring is a good option. Maybe it will get implemented in future. Thanks – codingbadger Apr 20 '11 at 15:10

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .