Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

By helping the site by flagging successfully (and therefore gaining higher flag weight), you typically inform that you are able to understand the system and be helpful.

Similarly, when you are helpful by editing posts (not necessarily even understanding anything, just making it better), you gain 2 points for each edit. Good flagging may require even more understanding; while editing just fixing spelling and/or formatting gives reputation points. You don't have to understand whether question (or answer) is on-topic, or even meaningful.

So, why there isn't for example 2 points for each flag that was acted on, in the same way flag weight increase is determined?

share|improve this question
Flags can be dismissed valid and trigger an increase in flag weight without having to be acted on. – badp Feb 27 '11 at 11:34
Same way your edit can be accepted, and then overwritten by another edit almost immediately. I don't see the difference. Also, if your flag is dismissed as valid without being acted on, maybe you shouldn't get reputation at all? – Olli Feb 27 '11 at 12:29
up vote 27 down vote accepted

As a side note, there are 2 different badges (one silver) for flagging.

I strongly suspect that if we has rep for flagging, we would immediately be drowning in flags, where previously a downvote may have been the most appropriate action. In many ways flagging is orthogonal to "normal" site activity; we fully encourage appropriate flagging, but we genuinely hope this isn't too high in scale.

Some users choose to be more active in their flagging, and (so long as the flags are valid) we support that - especially with the new silver.

For reputation, though - just keep providing great questions, answers and edits.

share|improve this answer
Good point, that in case of gaining reputation for flags, flagging is much tempting than downvote. – Olli Feb 27 '11 at 16:52
@Olli You could fix that by having flags cost 1 rep, but that'd discourage flagging. Big no no. – badp Feb 27 '11 at 17:39
@badp: obviously, that's why I didn't even suggest it. – Olli Feb 27 '11 at 17:49

I agree that flagging does help the site, but I'm not sure if it should be rewarded with reputation. The true meaning of reputation is already fairly confused with all the different ways you can get it. It is supposed to be a measure of your expertise and how much the community trusts you.

Awarding rep for things that help the community but don't actually require quality programming knowledge, like flagging, is controversial. Yes, you are helping the community, and you should be rewarded. But reputation is first and foremost what you know, and moving it away from that would hurt its significance for the careers site and dilute its purpose of measurement.

I believe the reasoning editing is being rewarded with rep is to encourage lower rep users to take new steps and become more active members in the community. Encouraging editing aspires them to gain greater privileges and continue to improve content. If a user submits an edit that is deemed unhelpful, it will not be approved, and no damage will be done. Unsuccessful flaggings are slightly more consequential as they will dilute the value of flags in general and just make it harder for the mods to find the posts that really need to be acted on. The only reason I could see for justifying flagging incentives is if low-quality posts weren't getting acted on, and to my knowledge there isn't any evidence to support this. A rush of flags for any post that might deserve it by users trying to gain reputation from it will not help anyone when the post already gets flagged by a few users as it is.

Extra edits on the other hand will not dilute the value of existing edits at all, and if anything will motivate more users to increase the quality of posts, resulting a win-win situation for everyone. I agree that edits often do not require any expertise to make, but adding incentives for edits will only increase quality, while adding incentives for flagging could potentially do more harm than good.

@Olli I do believe you have some good points and I agree with them; I'm just arguing the other side for the sake of understanding all the different sides of the issue. Feel more than free to attack or debate any arguments I've made. :D

share|improve this answer
You have good points, but with same argumentation it's bad to give out reputation for editing. – Olli Feb 27 '11 at 15:51
@Olli answer edited. :) – Gordon Gustafson Feb 27 '11 at 16:39
definitely good edit. However, I am not fully convinced with argument that more flagging is bad thing: flag weight is handling exactly that - if you flag badly multiple times, your flags lose value. I assume that if your flag weight drops enough, it's not handled anymore, but you can gain weight if others flag it too in the same way (or if that's not happening now, it can be changed). Also, if multiple users flag same post (before any actions against it), it's not worse than single flag, quite an oppose. I support debating over attacking; hopefully this is former. – Olli Feb 27 '11 at 16:51
remember that rep from suggested edits is capped at 1,000 and you can't suggest edits any more once you have 2k rep. – Jeff Atwood Feb 27 '11 at 22:07

Flagging is about informing moderators that there is a potential problem requiring immediate attention.

Editing questions and answers is designed to improve the question and answer. The edits generally require acceptance by the original poster, and should directly benefit the people who view those questions and answers.

Making a good edit requires much more thought and skill than simply clicking a flag button, and contributes more value to the site itself.

Even without you flagging, a moderator may eventually see a rogue post, but not everyone is capable of making the same edits.

share|improve this answer
In my opinion, many edits (including some of those done by me on other sites) do not require anything special. For example adding code block (four spaces) to code sample is perfectly valid edit, but do not require any knowledge on that specific post. Same goes for spelling fixes. On the other hand, when flagging something, you have to understand whether it's on-topic or off-topic, for example. – Olli Feb 27 '11 at 12:13
@Olli - You make a good argument. I guess both flagging and editing could be done either mindlessly or with thought. If we did give rep for flagging, how would you propose keeping it from being abused by flag rep whores? – jmort253 Feb 28 '11 at 5:32

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .