Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 158 Stack Exchange communities.

What is meta?
Here's how it works:
  1. Any Stack Exchange user can ask a question
  2. The community provides support, votes on ideas, and reports bugs
  3. Your voice helps shape the way Stack Exchange operates

Edit: Converting to a feature request:

I want to exclude from my search all the results that would normally come up from searching with user:me. I see from this question: Exclude specific words in stackoverflow search that there is no "NOT" operator for searches.

However since there is a "is accepted" and a "not accepted", I think a "not user" option would make perfect sense?

Example of use expected use:

It would be added in combination with other filters when searching through a specific tag or topic in order to filter out questions that the user has already answered. Especially in cases where a user is very active in that tag.

share|improve this question
There isn't a way, but you could turn this into a [feature-request] if you're going to put a bounty on it. It'd be nice to just have a generic NOT operator – Michael Mrozek Mar 7 '11 at 3:12
@Michael, I had mentioned the feature request for the NOT operator already. I was thinking this is like the "is accepted" search option, where there should be a "Not user" option. Anyway, I think you are right so I have changed this to a feature request. – jzd Mar 7 '11 at 13:15
I don't understand why this would be useful? This is the first time it's ever been requested in 3 years that I know of. – Jeff Atwood Mar 10 '11 at 8:32
@Jeff, this is not useful by itself. But in combination with other filters is where I would use it. Specifically when I am searching through a specific tag or topic that I spend a lot of time in, I find my results get filled with questions I have already answered. I would like to eliminate those so I can find questions in that topic that I haven't answered yet. – jzd Mar 10 '11 at 11:57

Sure, why not user:others?

(This could be extended to some criteria like user:♦ or user:10k although rep/mod status shouldn't state anything useful here I guess)

share|improve this answer
Maybe it should be user:mod so there is no awkward copy-pasting or Unicode codepoints? – hexafraction Nov 24 '12 at 21:37
@ObsessiveSSOℲ Oh come on, where's the point in making stalking your favourite mod too comfortable? :-P – Tobias Kienzler Nov 24 '12 at 23:46

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .