What is meta? ×
Meta Stack Exchange is where users like you discuss bugs, features, and support issues that affect the software powering all 133 Stack Exchange communities.

Duplicates seem to be one of the bigger issues for me when looking for answers. Many people also seem to ask questions without first looking for duplicates (I appreciate the irony that someone will probably find a duplicate of this very question and flame me in the comments; however, that just proves my point).

It would be great if there was one of the following to encourage less duplication. I'd be for losing reputation if enough people flag and agree that a post is duplicative (with citation). Also, give badges (reputation) to people who find duplicates and enough people agree on the duplication with the same citation.

In order to preserve the duplicates, have a duplicate section/button that will show in a threaded manner which posts have been considered by the community to be duplicates. This way, the duplicate questions at least aren't lost. The best part is the highest rated questions of the duplicate set can then be the master question for the duplicate set. The best answers would then be aggregated across all duplicate questions.

Sorry if this question is actually a duplicate.

share|improve this question
3  
possible duplicate of Prevent upvotes for questions closed as duplicates FLAME! –  Pëkka Mar 2 '11 at 16:51
2  
Also related/relevant: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/52530/… –  Pëkka Mar 2 '11 at 16:52
3  
And very related: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/37466 –  Pëkka Mar 2 '11 at 16:52
    
Yes, I definitely saw it coming :) However, I think that this happens, even when I look for stuff, shows that the issue can use some work. –  Scott Mar 2 '11 at 17:34
    
Uh, uh, uh! I want to play! My version was meta.stackexchange.com/q/7441/2509. All of which suggests that the problem is pretty deep. –  dmckee Mar 2 '11 at 18:15
    
Agreed, so we're part way there. You guys were good enough to link to others, so it shows up in links. But you get no credit for doing so, and there is no consolidated view of these. I think this is only half way there at this point. –  Scott Mar 2 '11 at 21:18

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

A lot of what you're suggesting is already in place. Moderators can merge duplicate questions together, but we only do so when two questions are pretty much exact duplicates. (My own rule of thumb for merging is that all the answers on one question have to make sense on the other.)

When the answers from one question are merged to another, the source question is linked to the target (effectively preserving the duplicate and marking it as a dupe). This provides a way for other people who search for the same question to find the answers. Any upvotes on the source question are also transferred to the target during a merge.

Also, give badges (reputation) to people who find duplicates and enough people agree on the duplication with the same citation.

I'd be in favor of a badge for that.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .